Rebecca B Naumann1, Ann M Dellinger, Marcie-jo Kresnow. 1. Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. RNaumann@cdc.gov
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Many older drivers self-restrict or avoid driving under high-risk conditions. Little is known about the onset of driving self-restrictions or how widespread self-restrictions are among drivers of all ages. METHODS: The Second Injury Control and Risk Survey (ICARIS-2) was a nationwide cross-sectional, list-assisted random-digit-dial telephone survey from 2001 to 2003. National prevalence estimates and weighted percentages of those reporting driving self-restrictions were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore associations between specific self-restrictions and age group, adjusting for other personal characteristics. RESULTS: More than half of all drivers reported at least one driving self-restriction. The most commonly reported restriction was avoidance of driving in bad weather (47.5%), followed by at night (27.9%) and on highways or high-speed roads (19%). A greater percentage of young adult women (18-24 years) reported self-restricting in bad weather compared to women in other age groups, and the percentage of drivers self-restricting at night, in bad weather, and on highways or high-speed roads increased steeply after age 64. We found that women, those in low income groups, and those who had driven low annual mileage were more likely to self-restrict. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to assessing self-restrictions among older drivers, a new finding from our study is that self-restrictions are also quite prevalent among younger age groups. Driving self-restrictions may be better understood as a spectrum across ages in which drivers' reasons for restriction change. IMPACT ON INDUSTRY: Future research on the ability of driving self-restrictions to reduce actual crash risk and prevent injuries is needed. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
INTRODUCTION: Many older drivers self-restrict or avoid driving under high-risk conditions. Little is known about the onset of driving self-restrictions or how widespread self-restrictions are among drivers of all ages. METHODS: The Second Injury Control and Risk Survey (ICARIS-2) was a nationwide cross-sectional, list-assisted random-digit-dial telephone survey from 2001 to 2003. National prevalence estimates and weighted percentages of those reporting driving self-restrictions were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore associations between specific self-restrictions and age group, adjusting for other personal characteristics. RESULTS: More than half of all drivers reported at least one driving self-restriction. The most commonly reported restriction was avoidance of driving in bad weather (47.5%), followed by at night (27.9%) and on highways or high-speed roads (19%). A greater percentage of young adult women (18-24 years) reported self-restricting in bad weather compared to women in other age groups, and the percentage of drivers self-restricting at night, in bad weather, and on highways or high-speed roads increased steeply after age 64. We found that women, those in low income groups, and those who had driven low annual mileage were more likely to self-restrict. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to assessing self-restrictions among older drivers, a new finding from our study is that self-restrictions are also quite prevalent among younger age groups. Driving self-restrictions may be better understood as a spectrum across ages in which drivers' reasons for restriction change. IMPACT ON INDUSTRY: Future research on the ability of driving self-restrictions to reduce actual crash risk and prevent injuries is needed. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Authors: Andrew J Aschenbrenner; Samantha A Murphy; Jason M Doherty; Ann M Johnson; Sayeh Bayat; Alexis Walker; Yasmin Peña; Jason Hassenstab; John C Morris; Ganesh M Babulal Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2022-10-06 Impact factor: 4.942
Authors: Meilin Yan; Ander Wilson; Jennifer L Peel; Sheryl Magzamen; Qinghua Sun; Tiantian Li; G Brooke Anderson Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 4.860
Authors: Mona A Kaleem; Beatriz E Munoz; Cynthia A Munro; Emily W Gower; Sheila K West Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-08-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Kingman P Strohl; Daniel B Brown; Nancy Collop; Charles George; Ronald Grunstein; Fang Han; Lawrence Kline; Atul Malhotra; Alan Pack; Barbara Phillips; Daniel Rodenstein; Richard Schwab; Terri Weaver; Kevin Wilson Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2013-06-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: L J Molnar; D W Eby; J M Vivoda; S E Bogard; J S Zakraksek; R M St Louis; N Zanier; L H Ryan; D LeBlanc; J Smith; R Yung; L Nyquist; C DiGuiseppi; G Li; T J Mielenz; D Strogatz Journal: Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav Date: 2018-03-15