Literature DB >> 21391553

Development of polarizable models for molecular mechanical calculations I: parameterization of atomic polarizability.

Junmei Wang1, Piotr Cieplak, Jie Li, Tingjun Hou, Ray Luo, Yong Duan.   

Abstract

In this work, four types of polarizable models have been developed for calculating interactions between atomic charges and induced point dipoles. These include the Applequist, Thole linear, Thole exponential model, and the Thole Tinker-like. The polarizability models have been optimized to reproduce the experimental static molecular polarizabilities obtained from the molecular refraction measurements on a set of 420 molecules reported by Bosque and Sales. We grouped the models into five sets depending on the interaction types, that is, whether the interactions of two atoms that form the bond, bond angle, and dihedral angle are turned off or scaled down. When 1-2 (bonded) and 1-3 (separated by two bonds) interactions are turned off, 1-4 (separated by three bonds) interactions are scaled down, or both, all models including the Applequist model achieved similar performance: the average percentage error (APE) ranges from 1.15 to 1.23%, and the average unsigned error (AUE) ranges from 0.143 to 0.158 Å(3). When the short-range 1-2, 1-3, and full 1-4 terms are taken into account (set D models), the APE ranges from 1.30 to 1.58% for the three Thole models, whereas the Applequist model (DA) has a significantly larger APE (3.82%). The AUE ranges from 0.166 to 0.196 Å(3) for the three Thole models, compared with 0.446 Å(3) for the Applequist model. Further assessment using the 70-molecule van Duijnen and Swart data set clearly showed that the developed models are both accurate and highly transferable and are in fact have smaller errors than the models developed using this particular data set (set E models). The fact that A, B, and C model sets are notably more accurate than both D and E model sets strongly suggests that the inclusion of 1-2 and 1-3 interactions reduces the transferability and accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21391553      PMCID: PMC3082581          DOI: 10.1021/jp112133g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  15 in total

1.  Polarizabilities of solvents from the chemical composition.

Authors:  Ramón Bosque; Joaquim Sales
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct

Review 2.  Force fields for protein simulations.

Authors:  Jay W Ponder; David A Case
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  2003

3.  Modeling Induction Phenomena in Intermolecular Interactions with an Ab Initio Force Field.

Authors:  François Dehez; János G Ángyán; Ignacio Soteras Gutiérrez; F Javier Luque; Klaus Schulten; Christophe Chipot
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Genetic algorithm-optimized QSPR models for bioavailability, protein binding, and urinary excretion.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; George Krudy; Xiang-Qun Xie; Chengde Wu; George Holland
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Continuum treatment of electronic polarization effect.

Authors:  Yu-Hong Tan; Ray Luo
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Fast approaches for molecular polarizability calculations.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Xiang-Qun Xie; Tingjun Hou; Xiaojie Xu
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 2.781

7.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking.

Authors:  G Jones; P Willett; R C Glen; A R Leach; R Taylor
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-04-04       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  An evolutionary approach to folding small alpha-helical proteins that uses sequence information and an empirical guiding fitness function.

Authors:  J U Bowie; D Eisenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-05-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Polarization effects in molecular mechanical force fields.

Authors:  Piotr Cieplak; François-Yves Dupradeau; Yong Duan; Junmei Wang
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 2.333

10.  Strike a balance: optimization of backbone torsion parameters of AMBER polarizable force field for simulations of proteins and peptides.

Authors:  Zhi-Xiang Wang; Wei Zhang; Chun Wu; Hongxing Lei; Piotr Cieplak; Yong Duan
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2006-04-30       Impact factor: 3.376

View more
  37 in total

1.  Application of molecular dynamics simulations in molecular property prediction II: diffusion coefficient.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Tingjun Hou
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 2.  Classical electrostatics for biomolecular simulations.

Authors:  G Andrés Cisneros; Mikko Karttunen; Pengyu Ren; Celeste Sagui
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 3.  Force field development phase II: Relaxation of physics-based criteria… or inclusion of more rigorous physics into the representation of molecular energetics.

Authors:  A T Hagler
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Recent Force Field Strategies for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.

Authors:  Junxi Mu; Hao Liu; Jian Zhang; Ray Luo; Hai-Feng Chen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 5.  Biomolecular electrostatics and solvation: a computational perspective.

Authors:  Pengyu Ren; Jaehun Chun; Dennis G Thomas; Michael J Schnieders; Marcelo Marucho; Jiajing Zhang; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.318

6.  Implementing electrostatic polarization cannot fill the gap between experimental and theoretical measurements for the ultrafast fluorescence decay of myoglobin.

Authors:  Bingbing Lin; Ya Gao; Yongxiu Li; John Z H Zhang; Ye Mei
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 7.  CHARMM additive and polarizable force fields for biophysics and computer-aided drug design.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; A D MacKerell
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-08-19

8.  Determining polarizable force fields with electrostatic potentials from quantum mechanical linear response theory.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Weitao Yang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Efficient formulation of polarizable Gaussian multipole electrostatics for biomolecular simulations.

Authors:  Haixin Wei; Ruxi Qi; Junmei Wang; Piotr Cieplak; Yong Duan; Ray Luo
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  A Multi-Scale Method for Dynamics Simulation in Continuum Solvent Models I: Finite-Difference Algorithm for Navier-Stokes Equation.

Authors:  Li Xiao; Qin Cai; Zhilin Li; Hongkai Zhao; Ray Luo
Journal:  Chem Phys Lett       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.