Literature DB >> 21389894

A mechanism of acquiring temozolomide resistance during transformation of atypical prolactinoma into prolactin-producing pituitary carcinoma: case report.

Mineko Murakami1, Akiko Mizutani, Shuichiro Asano, Hideki Katakami, Yoshinori Ozawa, Kazuto Yamazaki, Yasuo Ishida, Koji Takano, Hiroko Okinaga, Akira Matsuno.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: The case presented here describes the clinical evolution of a pituitary carcinoma from an atypical prolactinoma after temozolomide (TMZ) treatment. The mechanism of acquisition of TMZ resistance was analyzed. CLINICAL
PRESENTATION: A 60-year-old woman with atypical prolactinoma had been treated for 7 years with multiple therapies, including dopamine agonists, surgical intervention (5 times), conventional radiotherapy, and radiosurgery. The patient deteriorated as a result of tumor enlargement. Ten cycles of TMZ therapy, 200 mg/m for 5 days every 4 weeks, improved the patient's performance status and caused tumor shrinkage. Six months after discontinuation of TMZ, the tumor progressed into pituitary carcinoma with tumor regrowth and intraventricular dissemination. TMZ therapy was ineffective this time. A sixth surgery and salvage chemotherapy failed to improve the patient's condition, and she died 9 years after the first diagnosis. Throughout the treatment course, O6-methyl-guanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) was immunonegative in the tumor specimens, including the TMZ-refractory pituitary carcinoma. Mutation of p53 was identified in both the atypical prolactinoma and pituitary carcinoma. In contrast, major differences were noted for mismatch repair protein MSH6 immunostaining: Although MSH6 was diffusely immunopositive in the atypical adenoma, it became immunonegative when the tumor evolved into TMZ-refractory pituitary carcinoma.
CONCLUSION: Loss of MSH6 occurred during the progression from an atypical prolactinoma to a pituitary carcinoma, which may have caused resistance to TMZ treatment. This case suggests that preserving MSH6 function is essential for responsiveness to TMZ treatment in MGMT-negative and p53-mutated atypical pituitary adenoma or pituitary carcinoma.
Copyright © 2011 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21389894     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318217161a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  24 in total

Review 1.  Temozolomide responsiveness in aggressive corticotroph tumours: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  A K Annamalai; A F Dean; N Kandasamy; K Kovacs; H Burton; D J Halsall; A S Shaw; N M Antoun; H K Cheow; R W Kirollos; J D Pickard; H L Simpson; S J Jefferies; N G Burnet; M Gurnell
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 2.  Clinical review: Pituitary carcinoma: difficult diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Anthony P Heaney
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 3.  Corticotrophic pituitary carcinoma with cervical metastases: case series and literature review.

Authors:  Frederick Yoo; Edward C Kuan; Anthony P Heaney; Marvin Bergsneider; Marilene B Wang
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 4.  How effective is temozolomide for treating pituitary tumours and when should it be used?

Authors:  Carmel Halevy; Benjamin C Whitelaw
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 5.  Malignant transformation in non-functioning pituitary adenomas (pituitary carcinoma).

Authors:  Nèle Lenders; Ann McCormack
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  MGMT immunohistochemistry in pituitary tumors: controversies with clinical implications.

Authors:  George Kontogeorgos; Eleni Thodou; Mary Koutourousiou; Gregory Kaltsas; Andreas Seretis
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 7.  Molecular status of pituitary carcinoma and atypical adenoma that contributes the effectiveness of temozolomide.

Authors:  Akira Matsuno; Mineko Murakami; Katsumi Hoya; Shoko M Yamada; Shinya Miyamoto; So Yamada; Jae-Hyun Son; Hajime Nishido; Fuyuaki Ide; Hiroshi Nagashima; Mutsumi Sugaya; Toshio Hirohata; Akiko Mizutani; Hiroko Okinaga; Yudo Ishii; Shigeyuki Tahara; Akira Teramoto; R Yoshiyuki Osamura
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 2.309

8.  Temozolomide treatment of pituitary carcinomas and atypical adenomas: systematic review of case reports.

Authors:  Yan Ji; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Emil Lou
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2015-11-12

9.  Tumoral MGMT content predicts survival in patients with aggressive pituitary tumors and pituitary carcinomas given treatment with temozolomide.

Authors:  D Bengtsson; H D Schrøder; K Berinder; D Maiter; C Hoybye; O Ragnarsson; U Feldt-Rasmussen; Å Krogh Rasmussen; A van der Lely; M Petersson; G Johannsson; M Andersen; P Burman
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 3.633

10.  Prolactin-Secreting Pituitary Carcinoma with Dural Metastasis: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Justin Seltzer; John D Carmichael; Deborah Commins; Chia-Shang Jason Liu; Emily Omura; Eric Chang; Gabriel Zada
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 2.104

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.