Literature DB >> 21389222

Experimental protocols alter phototransduction: the implications for retinal processing at visual threshold.

Anthony W Azevedo1, Fred Rieke.   

Abstract

Vision in dim light, when photons are scarce, requires reliable signaling of the arrival of single photons. Rod photoreceptors accomplish this task through the use of a G-protein-coupled transduction cascade that amplifies the activity of single active rhodopsin molecules. This process is one of the best understood signaling cascades in biology, yet quantitative measurements of the amplitude and kinetics of the rod's response in mice vary by a factor of ∼ 2 across studies. What accounts for these discrepancies? We used several experimental approaches to reconcile differences in published properties of rod responses. First, we used suction electrode recordings from single rods to compare measurements across a range of recording conditions. Second, we compared measurements of single-cell photocurrents to estimates of rod function from in vitro electroretinograms. Third, we assayed the health of the post-receptor retinal tissue in these different conditions. Several salient points emerge from these experiments: (1) recorded responses can be altered dramatically by how the retina is stored; (2) the kinetics of the recovery of responses to bright but not dim flashes are strongly sensitive to the extracellular concentration of magnesium; (3) experimental conditions that produce very different single-photon responses measured in single rods produce near identical derived rod responses from the electroretinogram. The dependence of rod responses on experimental conditions will be a key consideration in efforts to extract general principles of G-protein signaling from studies of phototransduction and to relate these signals to downstream mechanisms that facilitate visual sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21389222      PMCID: PMC3063123          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4750-10.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  61 in total

1.  The membrane current of single rod outer segments.

Authors:  D A Baylor; T D Lamb; K W Yau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Temporal filtering in retinal bipolar cells. Elements of an optimal computation?

Authors:  W Bialek; W G Owen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Molecular origin of continuous dark noise in rod photoreceptors.

Authors:  F Rieke; D A Baylor
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Slowed recovery of rod photoresponse in mice lacking the GTPase accelerating protein RGS9-1.

Authors:  C K Chen; M E Burns; W He; T G Wensel; D A Baylor; M I Simon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-03       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  In vivo studies of signaling in rod pathways of the mouse using the electroretinogram.

Authors:  J G Robson; H Maeda; S M Saszik; L J Frishman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Quantal noise from human red cone pigment.

Authors:  Yingbin Fu; Vladimir Kefalov; Dong-Gen Luo; Tian Xue; King-Wai Yau
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Binding of guanylyl cyclase activating protein 1 (GCAP1) to retinal guanylyl cyclase (RetGC1). The role of individual EF-hands.

Authors:  Igor V Peshenko; Elena V Olshevskaya; Alexander M Dizhoor
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Counting every quantum.

Authors:  B Sakitt
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Background light produces a recoverin-dependent modulation of activated-rhodopsin lifetime in mouse rods.

Authors:  Ching-Kang Chen; Michael L Woodruff; Frank S Chen; Desheng Chen; Gordon L Fain
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Arrestin competition influences the kinetics and variability of the single-photon responses of mammalian rod photoreceptors.

Authors:  Thuy Doan; Anthony W Azevedo; James B Hurley; Fred Rieke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  20 in total

1.  Structural, energetic, and mechanical perturbations in rhodopsin mutant that causes congenital stationary night blindness.

Authors:  Shiho Kawamura; Alejandro T Colozo; Lin Ge; Daniel J Müller; Paul S-H Park
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  The photovoltage of rods and cones in the dark-adapted mouse retina.

Authors:  Lorenzo Cangiano; Sabrina Asteriti; Luigi Cervetto; Claudia Gargini
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  A kinetic analysis of mouse rod and cone photoreceptor responses.

Authors:  Jürgen Reingruber; Norianne T Ingram; Khris G Griffis; Gordon L Fain
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Sensitivity of Mammalian Cone Photoreceptors to Infrared Light.

Authors:  Frans Vinberg; Grazyna Palczewska; Jianye Zhang; Katarzyna Komar; Maciej Wojtkowski; Vladimir J Kefalov; Krzysztof Palczewski
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Simultaneous ex vivo functional testing of two retinas by in vivo electroretinogram system.

Authors:  Frans Vinberg; Vladimir Kefalov
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Rod Photoresponse Kinetics Limit Temporal Contrast Sensitivity in Mesopic Vision.

Authors:  Yumiko Umino; Ying Guo; Ching-Kang Chen; Rose Pasquale; Eduardo Solessio
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Speeding rod recovery improves temporal resolution in the retina.

Authors:  Christopher R Fortenbach; Christopher Kessler; Gabriel Peinado Allina; Marie E Burns
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Ophthalmic Manifestations of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).

Authors:  Nicholas J Volpe; Joseph Simonett; Amani A Fawzi; Teepu Siddique
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2015

9.  Biophysical Variation within the M1 Type of Ganglion Cell Photoreceptor.

Authors:  Alan J Emanuel; Kush Kapur; Michael Tri H Do
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 9.423

10.  Light responses of primate and other mammalian cones.

Authors:  Li-Hui Cao; Dong-Gen Luo; King-Wai Yau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.