Literature DB >> 21389098

Combined promoter methylation analysis of CADM1 and MAL: an objective triage tool for high-risk human papillomavirus DNA-positive women.

Albertus T Hesselink1, Daniëlle A M Heideman, Renske D M Steenbergen, Veerle M H Coupé, Renee M Overmeer, Dorien Rijkaart, Johannes Berkhof, Chris J L M Meijer, Peter J F Snijders.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Screening women for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cervical cancer (CIN3(+)) by high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing has as side-effect the detection of hrHPV-positive women without clinically relevant lesions. Here, we developed an objective assay assessing the methylation status of the promoter regions of CADM1 and MAL to triage hrHPV-positive women for CIN3(+). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: In a training set (51 women with CIN3(+) and 224 without CIN2(+)), panels consisting of one to four quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) assays (CADM1-m12,CADM1-m18,MAL-m1,MAL-m2) were analyzed. Cross-validated receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed and the panel with highest partial cross-validated area under the curve (AUC) was used for validation in an independent set of 236 consecutive hrHPV-positive women from a screening cohort. In the validation set, the ROC curve of the panel was compared with CIN3(+) sensitivity and specificity of cytology and of cytology combined with HPV16/18 genotyping.
RESULTS: In the training set, CADM1-m18 combined with MAL-m1 was the best panel (cross-validated partial AUC = 0.719). In the validation set, this panel revealed CIN3(+) sensitivities ranging from 100% (95% CI: 92.4-100) to 60.5% (95% CI: 47.1-74.6), with corresponding specificities ranging from 22.7% (95% CI: 20.2-25.2) to 83.3% (95% CI: 78.4-87.4). For cytology these were 65.8% (95% CI: 52.3-79.0) and 78.8% (95% CI: 73.7-83.1) and for cytology/HPV16/18, these were 84.2% (95% CI: 72.0-92.7) and 54.0% (95% CI: 49.2-58.7), respectively. The point estimates of both cytology and cytology/HPV16/18 were equal to the values of the ROC curve of CADM1-m18/MAL-m1.
CONCLUSIONS: We developed an objective methylation marker panel that was equally discriminatory for CIN3(+) as cytology or cytology with HPV16/18 genotyping in hrHPV-positive women. This opens the possibility for complete cervical screening by objective, nonmorphological molecular methods. ©2011 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21389098     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  56 in total

Review 1.  Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer: biomarkers for improved prevention efforts.

Authors:  Vikrant V Sahasrabuddhe; Patricia Luhn; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.165

2.  Discovery and validation of candidate host DNA methylation markers for detection of cervical precancer and cancer.

Authors:  Megan A Clarke; Patricia Luhn; Julia C Gage; Clara Bodelon; S Terence Dunn; Joan Walker; Rosemary Zuna; Stephen Hewitt; J Keith Killian; Liying Yan; Andrew Miller; Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Screening: Cervical cancer--should we abandon cytology for screening?

Authors:  Chris J L M Meijer; Johannes Berkhof
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 4.  Clinical implications of (epi)genetic changes in HPV-induced cervical precancerous lesions.

Authors:  Renske D M Steenbergen; Peter J F Snijders; Daniëlle A M Heideman; Chris J L M Meijer
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology for detecting cervical (pre)cancer in a HPV-positive gynecologic outpatient population.

Authors:  Roosmarijn Luttmer; Maaike G Dijkstra; Peter J F Snijders; Johannes Berkhof; Folkert J van Kemenade; Lawrence Rozendaal; Theo J M Helmerhorst; René H M Verheijen; W Abraham Ter Harmsel; W Marchien van Baal; Peppino G C M Graziosi; Wim G V Quint; Johan W M Spruijt; Dorenda K E van Dijken; Daniëlle A M Heideman; Chris J L M Meijer
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Cervical cancer risk for women undergoing concurrent testing for human papillomavirus and cervical cytology: a population-based study in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Walter K Kinney; Barbara Fetterman; Thomas Lorey; Nancy E Poitras; Li Cheung; Franklin Demuth; Mark Schiffman; Sholom Wacholder; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) E6/E7 mRNA testing by PreTect HPV-Proofer for detection of cervical high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer among hrHPV DNA-positive women with normal cytology.

Authors:  D C Rijkaart; D A M Heideman; V M H Coupe; A A T P Brink; R H M Verheijen; H Skomedal; F Karlsen; E Morland; P J F Snijders; C J L M Meijer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Methylation-mediated transcriptional repression of microRNAs during cervical carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Saskia M Wilting; Wina Verlaat; Annelieke Jaspers; Nour A Makazaji; Reuven Agami; Chris J L M Meijer; Peter J F Snijders; Renske D M Steenbergen
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 4.528

9.  HPV-based Tests for Cervical Cancer Screening and Management of Cervical Disease.

Authors:  Patricia Luhn; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep       Date:  2013-06-01

Review 10.  Human papillomavirus infections: warts or cancer?

Authors:  Louise T Chow; Thomas R Broker
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 10.005

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.