Literature DB >> 21389029

Fight tactics in wood ants: individuals in smaller groups fight harder but die faster.

Tim P Batchelor1, Mark Briffa.   

Abstract

When social animals engage in inter-group contests, the outcome is determined by group sizes and individual masses, which together determine group resource-holding potential ('group RHP'). Individuals that perceive themselves as being in a group with high RHP may receive a motivational increase and increase their aggression levels. Alternatively, individuals in lower RHP groups may increase their aggression levels in an attempt to overcome the RHP deficit. We investigate how 'group RHP' influences agonistic tactics in red wood ants Formica rufa. Larger groups had higher total agonistic indices, but per capita agonistic indices were highest in the smallest groups, indicating that individuals in smaller groups fought harder. Agonistic indices were influenced by relative mean mass, focal group size, opponent group size and opponent group agonistic index. Focal group attrition rates decreased as focal group relative agonistic indices increased and there was a strong negative influence of relative mean mass. The highest focal attrition rates were received when opponent groups were numerically large and composed of large individuals. Thus, fight tactics in F. rufa seem to vary with both aspects of group RHP, group size and the individual attributes of group members, indicating that information on these are available to fighting ants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21389029      PMCID: PMC3169020          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  16 in total

1.  Effect of environmental enrichment upon resource holding power in fish in prior residence situations.

Authors: 
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2000-04-03       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Numerical assessment affects aggression and competitive ability: a team-fighting strategy for the ant Formica xerophila.

Authors:  Colby J Tanner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Fighting for shells: how private information about resource value changes hermit crab pre-fight displays and escalated fight behaviour.

Authors:  Gareth Arnott; Robert W Elwood
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Resource holding potential, subjective resource value, and game theoretical models of aggressiveness signalling.

Authors:  Peter L Hurd
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Interaction location outweighs the competitive advantage of numerical superiority in Cebus capucinus intergroup contests.

Authors:  Margaret C Crofoot; Ian C Gilby; Martin C Wikelski; Roland W Kays
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Benjamin M Bolker; Mollie E Brooks; Connie J Clark; Shane W Geange; John R Poulsen; M Henry H Stevens; Jada-Simone S White
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Territorial strategies in ants.

Authors:  B Hölldobler; C J Lumsden
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-11-14       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Nestmate and kin recognition in interspecific mixed colonies of ants.

Authors:  N F Carlin; B Hölldobler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-12-02       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Group territoriality in two populations of African lions

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Exploitative strategies of the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) and native ant species in a southern Spanish pine forest.

Authors:  S Carpintero; J Retana; X Cerdá; J Reyes-López; L Arias de Reyna
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.377

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  The evolutionary interplay of intergroup conflict and altruism in humans: a review of parochial altruism theory and prospects for its extension.

Authors:  Hannes Rusch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Intergroup aggression in meerkats.

Authors:  Mark Dyble; Thomas M Houslay; Marta B Manser; Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Increased aggression during human group contests when competitive ability is more similar.

Authors:  Gert Stulp; Tobias Kordsmeyer; Abraham P Buunk; Simon Verhulst
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Worker senescence and the sociobiology of aging in ants.

Authors:  Ysabel Milton Giraldo; James F A Traniello
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  An experimental test of Lanchester's models of combat in the neotropical termite Nasutitermes corniger (Blattodea: Termitidae).

Authors:  Elizabeth M Clifton; Paul O Lewis; Elizabeth Jockusch; Eldridge Adams
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 5.530

6.  Infants use relative numerical group size to infer social dominance.

Authors:  Anthea Pun; Susan A J Birch; Andrew Scott Baron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Prairie dogs increase fitness by killing interspecific competitors.

Authors:  John L Hoogland; Charles R Brown
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Individual participation in intergroup contests is mediated by numerical assessment strategies in black howler and tufted capuchin monkeys.

Authors:  Sarie Van Belle; Clara J Scarry
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Within-group behavioural consequences of between-group conflict: a prospective review.

Authors:  Andrew N Radford; Bonaventura Majolo; Filippo Aureli
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  What determines the duration of war? Insights from assessment strategies in animal contests.

Authors:  Mark Briffa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.