Literature DB >> 21388736

Long-term risk of clinical progression after biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy: the impact of time from surgery to recurrence.

Stephen A Boorjian1, R Houston Thompson, Matthew K Tollefson, Laureano J Rangel, Eric J Bergstralh, Michael L Blute, R Jeffrey Karnes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The natural history of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) is variable and does not always translate into systemic progression or prostate cancer (PCa) death.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term clinical outcomes of patients with BCR and to determine predictors of disease progression and mortality in these men. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We reviewed our institutional registry of 14 632 patients who underwent RRP between 1990 and 2006 to identify 2426 men with BCR (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] levels ≥ 0.4 ng/ml) who did not receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Median follow-up was 11.5 yr after RRP and 6.6 yr after BCR. INTERVENTION: RRP. MEASUREMENTS: Patients were grouped into quartiles according to time from RRP to BCR. Survival after BCR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to analyze clinicopathologic variables associated with systemic progression and death from PCa. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Median systemic progression-free survival (PFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) had not been reached after 15 yr of follow-up after BCR. Cancer-specific mortality 10 yr after BCR was 9.9%, 9.3%, 7.8%, and 4.7% for patients who experienced BCR <1.2 yr, 1.2-3.1 yr, 3.1-5.9 yr, and >5.9 yr after RRP, respectively (p=0.10). On multivariate analysis, time from RRP to BCR was not significantly associated with the risk of systemic progression (p=0.50) or cancer-specific mortality (p=0.81). Older patient age, increased pathologic Gleason score, advanced tumor stage, and rapid PSA doubling time (DT) predicted systemic progression and death from PCa. Limitations included retrospective design, varied utilization of salvage therapies, and the inclusion of few patients with positive lymph nodes.
CONCLUSIONS: Only a minority of men experience systemic progression and death from PCa following BCR. The decision to institute secondary therapies must balance the risk of disease progression with the cost and morbidity of treatment, independent of time from RRP to BCR.
Copyright © 2011 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21388736     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.02.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  83 in total

1.  Comment on: "Long-term outcomes of salvage lymph node dissection for clinically recurrent prostate cancer: results of a single-institution series with a minimum follow-up of 5 years".

Authors:  Christoph-A von Klot; Axel S Merseburger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Genetic variants in the TEP1 gene are associated with prostate cancer risk and recurrence.

Authors:  C Gu; Q Li; Y Zhu; Y Qu; G Zhang; M Wang; Y Yang; J Wang; L Jin; Q Wei; D Ye
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 5.554

3.  Validation of a Genomic Risk Classifier to Predict Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality in Men with Adverse Pathologic Features.

Authors:  R Jeffrey Karnes; Voleak Choeurng; Ashley E Ross; Edward M Schaeffer; Eric A Klein; Stephen J Freedland; Nicholas Erho; Kasra Yousefi; Mandeep Takhar; Elai Davicioni; Matthew R Cooperberg; Bruce J Trock
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  The value of multimodality imaging in the investigation of a PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy in the Irish hospital setting.

Authors:  L C McLoughlin; S Inder; D Moran; C O'Rourke; R P Manecksha; T H Lynch
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Low detectable prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy--treat or watch?

Authors:  Dmitry Koulikov; Maura C Mohler; Diana C Mehedint; Kristopher Attwood; Gregory E Wilding; James L Mohler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Combined Whole Body and Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a 1-Step Approach to the Simultaneous Assessment of Local Recurrence and Metastatic Disease after Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nicola L Robertson; Evis Sala; Matthias Benz; Jonathan Landa; Peter Scardino; Howard I Scher; Hedvig Hricak; Hebert A Vargas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Expected population impacts of discontinued prostate-specific antigen screening.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Alex Tsodikov; Ruth Etzioni; Rachel A Hunter-Merrill; John L Gore; Angela B Mariotto; Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Editorial: early PSA-testing after radical prostatectomy-the truth behind the scenes.

Authors:  Julian Hanske; Florian Roghmann; Joachim Noldus; Marko Brock
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-07

9.  A Framework for Treatment Decision Making at Prostate Cancer Recurrence.

Authors:  Jane M Lange; Bruce J Trock; Roman Gulati; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Prostate-specific antigen measured 3 months after radical prostatectomy as a new predictor of biochemical recurrence.

Authors:  Hitoshi Inoue; Kensaku Nishimura; Seiji Yamaguchi; Norio Nonomura; Tsuneo Hara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.