Literature DB >> 21388373

What determines variation in home range size across spatiotemporal scales in a large browsing herbivore?

Floris M van Beest1, Inger M Rivrud, Leif E Loe, Jos M Milner, Atle Mysterud.   

Abstract

1. Most studies of intraspecific variation in home range size have investigated only a single or a few factors and often at one specific scale. However, considering multiple spatial and temporal scales when defining a home range is important as mechanisms that affect variation in home range size may differ depending on the scale under investigation. 2. We aim to quantify the relative effect of various individual, forage and climatic determinants of variation in home range size across multiple spatiotemporal scales in a large browsing herbivore, the moose (Alces alces), living at the southern limit of its distribution in Norway. 3. Total home range size and core home range areas were estimated for daily to monthly scales in summer and winter using both local convex hull (LoCoH) and fixed kernel home range methods. Variance in home range size was analysed using linear mixed-effects models for repeated measurements. 4. Reproductive status was the most influential individual-level factor explaining variance in moose home range size, with females accompanied by a calf having smaller summer ranges across all scales. Variation in home range size was strongly correlated with spatiotemporal changes in quantity and quality of natural food resources. Home range size decreased with increasing browse density at daily scales, but the relationship changed to positive at longer temporal scales. In contrast, browse quality was consistently negatively correlated with home range size except at the monthly scale during winter when depletion of high-quality forage occurs. Local climate affected total home range size more than core areas. Temperature, precipitation and snow depth influenced home range size directly at short temporal scales. 5. The relative effects of intrinsic and extrinsic determinants of variation in home range size differed with spatiotemporal scale, providing clear evidence that home range size is scale dependent in this large browser. Insight into the behavioural responses of populations to climatic stochasticity and forage variability is essential in view of current and future climate change, especially for populations with thermoregulatory restrictions living at the southern limit of their distribution.
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2011 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21388373     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01829.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  37 in total

1.  Hunting behaviour and breeding performance of northern goshawks Accipiter gentilis, in relation to resource availability, sex, age and morphology.

Authors:  Vincenzo Penteriani; Christian Rutz; Robert Kenward
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-08-31

Review 2.  Home ranges, habitat and body mass: simple correlates of home range size in ungulates.

Authors:  Endre Grüner Ofstad; Ivar Herfindal; Erling Johan Solberg; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Individual and spatio-temporal variations in the home range behaviour of a long-lived, territorial species.

Authors:  Letizia Campioni; María del Mar Delgado; Rui Lourenço; Giulia Bastianelli; Nestor Fernández; Vincenzo Penteriani
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Temporal variation in site fidelity: scale-dependent effects of forage abundance and predation risk in a non-migratory large herbivore.

Authors:  F M van Beest; E Vander Wal; A V Stronen; P C Paquet; R K Brook
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Home range size variation in a recovering wolf population: evaluating the effect of environmental, demographic, and social factors.

Authors:  Jenny Mattisson; Håkan Sand; Petter Wabakken; Vincenzo Gervasi; Olof Liberg; John D C Linnell; Geir Rune Rauset; Hans Christian Pedersen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Truly sedentary? The multi-range tactic as a response to resource heterogeneity and unpredictability in a large herbivore.

Authors:  Ophélie Couriot; A J Mark Hewison; Sonia Saïd; Francesca Cagnacci; Simon Chamaillé-Jammes; John D C Linnell; Atle Mysterud; Wibke Peters; Ferdinando Urbano; Marco Heurich; Petter Kjellander; Sandro Nicoloso; Anne Berger; Pavel Sustr; Max Kroeschel; Leif Soennichsen; Robin Sandfort; Benedikt Gehr; Nicolas Morellet
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Forage stoichiometry predicts the home range size of a small terrestrial herbivore.

Authors:  Matteo Rizzuto; Shawn J Leroux; Eric Vander Wal; Isabella C Richmond; Travis R Heckford; Juliana Balluffi-Fry; Yolanda F Wiersma
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  African forest elephant movements depend on time scale and individual behavior.

Authors:  Christopher Beirne; Thomas M Houslay; Peter Morkel; Connie J Clark; Mike Fay; Joseph Okouyi; Lee J T White; John R Poulsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Selection on fish personality differs between a no-take marine reserve and fished areas.

Authors:  Susanna Huneide Thorbjørnsen; Even Moland; David Villegas-Ríos; Katinka Bleeker; Halvor Knutsen; Esben Moland Olsen
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  Linking alternative reproductive tactics and habitat selection in Northern chamois.

Authors:  Luca Corlatti; Antonella Cotza; Luca Nelli
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.