Literature DB >> 34131817

Forage stoichiometry predicts the home range size of a small terrestrial herbivore.

Matteo Rizzuto1, Shawn J Leroux2, Eric Vander Wal2, Isabella C Richmond2, Travis R Heckford2, Juliana Balluffi-Fry2, Yolanda F Wiersma2.   

Abstract

Home range size of consumers varies with food quality, but the many ways of defining food quality hamper comparisons across studies. Ecological stoichiometry studies the elemental balance of ecological processes and offers a uniquely quantitative, transferrable way to assess food quality using elemental ratios, e.g., carbon (C):nitrogen (N). Here, we test whether snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) vary their home range size in response to spatial patterns of C:N, C:phosphorus (P), and N:P ratios of two preferred boreal forage species, lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium) and red maple (Acer rubrum), in summer months. Boreal forests are N- and P-limited ecosystems and access to N- and P-rich forage is paramount to snowshoe hares' survival. Accordingly, we consider forage with higher C content relative to N and P to be lower quality than forage with lower relative C content. We combine elemental distribution models with summer home range size estimates to test the hypothesis that home range size will be smaller in areas with access to high, homogeneous food quality compared to areas of low, heterogeneous food quality. Our results show snowshoe hares had smaller home ranges in areas where lowbush blueberry foliage quality was higher or more spatially homogenous than in areas of lower, more heterogeneous food quality. By responding to spatial patterns of food quality, consumers may influence community and ecosystem processes by, for example, varying nutrient recycling rates. Our reductionist biogeochemical approach to viewing resources leads us to holistic insights into consumer spatial ecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Boreal forest; Ecological stoichiometry; Resource quality; Snowshoe hare; Space use

Year:  2021        PMID: 34131817     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-021-04965-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  23 in total

1.  Plant stoichiometry at different scales: element concentration patterns reflect environment more than genotype.

Authors:  Göran I Ågren; Martin Weih
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 10.151

2.  Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates.

Authors:  Luca Börger; Novella Franconi; Giampiero De Michele; Alberto Gantz; Fiora Meschi; Andrea Manica; Sandro Lovari; Tim Coulson
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 3.  Converting nitrogen into protein--beyond 6.25 and Jones' factors.

Authors:  François Mariotti; Daniel Tomé; Philippe Patureau Mirand
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.176

4.  Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes.

Authors:  S L Lima; P A Zollner
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 5.  Biogeochemistry and Geographical Ecology: Embracing All Twenty-Five Elements Required to Build Organisms.

Authors:  Michael Kaspari; Jennifer S Powers
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Stoichiometric distribution models: ecological stoichiometry at the landscape extent.

Authors:  Shawn J Leroux; Eric Vander Wal; Yolanda F Wiersma; Louis Charron; Jonathan D Ebel; Nichola M Ellis; Christopher Hart; Emilie Kissler; Paul W Saunders; Lucie Moudrá; Amy L Tanner; Semra Yalcin
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Phytochemicals Involved in Plant Resistance to Leporids and Cervids: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Emilie Champagne; Alejandro A Royo; Jean-Pierre Tremblay; Patricia Raymond
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Habitat quality influences population distribution, individual space use and functional responses in habitat selection by a large herbivore.

Authors:  Kari Bjørneraas; Ivar Herfindal; Erling Johan Solberg; Bernt-Erik Sæther; Bram van Moorter; Christer Moe Rolandsen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Accounting for location uncertainty in azimuthal telemetry data improves ecological inference.

Authors:  Brian D Gerber; Mevin B Hooten; Christopher P Peck; Mindy B Rice; James H Gammonley; Anthony D Apa; Amy J Davis
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.600

10.  Quantity-quality trade-offs revealed using a multiscale test of herbivore resource selection on elemental landscapes.

Authors:  Juliana Balluffi-Fry; Shawn J Leroux; Yolanda F Wiersma; Travis R Heckford; Matteo Rizzuto; Isabella C Richmond; Eric Vander Wal
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  1 in total

1.  Ecoregion and community structure influences on the foliar elemental niche of balsam fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.) and white birch (Betula papyrifera Marshall).

Authors:  Travis R Heckford; Shawn J Leroux; Eric Vander Wal; Matteo Rizzuto; Juliana Balluffi-Fry; Isabella C Richmond; Yolanda F Wiersma
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-09-11       Impact factor: 3.167

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.