| Literature DB >> 21385355 |
Thomas Scheffold1, Silke Kullmann, Andreas Huge, Priska Binner, Hermann R Ochs, Wolfgang Schöls, Joachim Thale, Wolfgang Motz, Franz Josef Hegge, Christoph Stellbrink, Thomas Dorsel, Hartmut Gülker, Hubertus Heuer, Wilfried Dinh, Monika Stoll, Georg Haltern.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent genome-wide association studies have identified several genetic loci linked to coronary artery disease (CAD) and myocardial infarction (MI). The 9p21.3 locus was verified by numerous replication studies to be the first common locus for CAD and MI. In the present study, we investigated whether six single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) rs1333049, rs1333040, rs10757274, rs2383206, rs10757278, and rs2383207 representing the 9p21.3 locus were associated with the incidence of an acute MI in patients with the main focus on the familial aggregation of the disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21385355 PMCID: PMC3061953 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2261-11-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Clinical characteristics of the study population
| Characteristic | Study Population n = 976 |
|---|---|
| STEMI | 711 (72.8) |
| NSTEMI | 266 (27.2) |
| 52 ± 8,7 | |
| ≤ 55 | 601 (61.6) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 131 (13.4) |
| Hypertension | 507 (51.9) |
| Hyperlipidaemia | 529 (54.2) |
| Former or current smoker | 843 (86.4) |
| BMI -- kg/m2 | 28 ± 4.97 |
| BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 | 280 (28.7) |
| 361 (37.0) | |
| Previous MI | |
| > 14 days | 99 (10.1) |
| < 14 days | 9 (0.9) |
| CAD | 156 (16.0) |
| PCI | 111 (11.4) |
| CABG | 27 (2.8) |
| Stroke | 14 (1.4) |
| PAOD | 26 (2.6) |
Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation; MI myocardial infarction, STEMI ST-elevation myocardial infarction, NSTEMI non ST-elevation myocardial infarction, CAD coronary artery disease, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention, BMI body mass index, CABG coronary artery bypass grafting, PAOD peripheral artery occlusive disease.
Association of six variants on 9p21.3: MI study population vs. controls
| Variant | Controls | Risk Allele Frequency | MI Cases n = 976 | Risk Allele Frequency | HW | P value | OR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b) n = 3532 | |||||||||
| C/C | T/T | T: 0.50 | C/C | T/T | T: 0.56 | 0,993 | <0.0001 | 1.621 (1.317-2.994) | |
| 893 | 889 | 181 | 292 | ||||||
| c) n = 9053 | |||||||||
| A/A | G/G | G: 0.45 | A/A | G/G | G: 0.52 | 0,075 | <0.0001 | 1.904 (1.570-2.309) | |
| 2752 | 1758 | 208 | 253 | ||||||
| c) n = 9053 | |||||||||
| A/A | G/G | G: 0.47 | A/A | G/G | G: 0.55 | 0,06 | <0.0001 | 1.867 (1.535-2.272) | |
| 2489 | 1981 | 183 | 272 | ||||||
| b) n = 3532 | |||||||||
| A/A | G/G | G: 0.46 | A/A | G/G | G: 0.55 | 0,25 | <0.0001 | 2.039 (1.654-2.514) | |
| 1016 | 746 | 183 | 274 | ||||||
| b) n = 718 | |||||||||
| A/A | G/G | G: 0.43 | A/A | G/G | G: 0.52 | 0,062 | <0.0001 | 1.941 (1.458-2.583) | |
| 224 | 128 | 211 | 243 | ||||||
| a) n = 999 | |||||||||
| G/G | C/C | C: 0.46 | G/G | C/C | C: 0.52 | 0,233 | <0.0001 | 1.653 (1.280-2.135) | |
| 292 | 205 | 212 | 246 |
Genotype distribution and allelic frequencies of the investigated SNPs on 9p21.3 of the overall study cohort were compared with control data of the PopGen cohort (a) [11], the Iceland B collective (b) [4] or the Copenhagen City Heart Study (c) [3]. HW: P value for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test. P values and Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for the high-risk homozygous alleles.
Association of six variants on 9p21.3: MI study subpopulation with a positive family history vs. Controls
| Variant | Controls | Risk Allele Frequency | Positive Family History | Risk Allele Frequency | P value | OR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b) n = 3532 | ||||||||
| C/C | T/T | T: 0.50 | C/C | T/T | T: 0.57 | <0.0001 | 1.892 (1.366-2.619) | |
| 893 | 889 | 60 | 113 | |||||
| c) n = 9053 | ||||||||
| A/A | G/G | G: 0.45 | A/A | G/G | G: 0.56 | <0.0001 | 2.625 (1.922-3.585) | |
| 2752 | 1758 | 65 | 109 | |||||
| c) n = 9053 | ||||||||
| A/A | G/G | G: 0.47 | A/A | G/G | G: 0.57 | <0.0001 | 2.351 (1.719-3.214) | |
| 2489 | 1981 | 62 | 116 | |||||
| b) n = 3532 | ||||||||
| A/A | G/G | G: 0.46 | A/A | G/G | G: 0.58 | <0.0001 | 2.570 (1.864-3.543) | |
| 1016 | 746 | 62 | 117 | |||||
| b) n = 718 | ||||||||
| A/A | G/G | G: 0.43 | A/A | G/G | G: 0.55 | <0.0001 | 2.769 (1.904-4.026) | |
| 224 | 128 | 67 | 106 | |||||
| a) n = 999 | ||||||||
| G/G | C/C | C: 0.46 | G/G | C/C | C: 0.55 | <0.0001 | 2.232 (1.567-3.180) | |
| 292 | 205 | 67 | 105 | |||||
Genotype distribution and allelic frequencies of the investigated SNPs on 9p21.3 of the study subpopulation with a positive family history compared to control of the PopGen cohort (a) [11], the Iceland B collective (b) [4] or the Copenhagen City Heart Study (c) [3]. P values and Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for the high-risk homozygous alleles.
Association of six variants on 9p21.3: MI study subpopulation with a positive family history vs. MI study subpopulation with a negative family history
| Variant | Negative Family History n = 404 | Risk Allele Frequency | Positive Family History n = 361 | Risk Allele Frequency | P value | OR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C/C | T/T | T: 0.53 | C/C | T/T | T: 0.57 | 0.102 | 1.426(0.932-2.180) | |
| 81 | 107 | 60 | 113 | |||||
| A/A | G/G | G: 0.48 | A/A | G/G | G: 0.56 | 0.002 | 1.940(1.269-2.964) | |
| 96 | 83 | 65 | 109 | |||||
| A/A | G/G | G: 0.51 | A/A | G/G | G: 0.57 | 0.015 | 1.703(1.108-2.618) | |
| 81 | 89 | 62 | 116 | |||||
| A/A | G/G | G: 0.51 | A/A | G/G | G: 0.58 | 0.016 | 1.696(1.103-2.608) | |
| 80 | 89 | 62 | 117 | |||||
| A/A | G/G | G: 0.47 | A/A | G/G | G: 0.55 | 0.003 | 1.923(1.256-2.944) | |
| 96 | 79 | 67 | 106 | |||||
| G/G | C/C | C: 0.48 | G/G | C/C | C: 0.55 | 0.003 | 1.896(1.241-2.898) | |
| 98 | 81 | 67 | 105 | |||||
Genotype distribution and allelic frequencies of the investigated SNPs on 9p21.3 of the study subpopulation with a positive family history were compared with the study subpopulation with a negative family history. P values and Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for the high-risk homozygous alleles.
Figure 1Homozygous Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals for the investigated SNPs. Boxes indicate the relative size of samples. Grey boxes indicate ORs and CIs for the overall cohort of MI patients, black boxes for patients represented with a positive family history.
Figure 2Haplotype analysis for the investigated SNPs. As can be seen, all SNPs with the exception of the rs1333040 show a positive association of the phenotype MI in the presents of a positive family history of the disease. The haplotypes GGGGC and AAAAG revealed the strongest association of MI with a positive family history.