Literature DB >> 21384383

The cost-effectiveness of community-based screening for oral cancer in high-risk males in the United States: a Markov decision analysis approach.

Raj C Dedhia1, Kenneth J Smith, Jonas T Johnson, Mark Roberts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The 2004 US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines do not recommend routinely screening adults for oral cancer given no proven mortality reduction. A large cluster-randomized controlled screening trial in Kerala, India, in 2005, however, reported a significant reduction in mortality for screened male tobacco and/or alcohol users. In the United States, office-based screening efforts targeting males of high risk (regular use of tobacco and/or alcohol) have been unsuccessful due to poor attendance. Given the newfound screening mortality benefit to this high-risk subpopulation, we sought to ascertain the cost-effectiveness threshold of a yearly, community outreach screening program for males more than 40 years regularly using tobacco and/or alcohol. STUDY
DESIGN: Markov decision analysis model; societal perspective.
METHODS: A literature search was performed to determine event probabilities, health utilities, and cost parameters to serve as model inputs. Screen versus No-Screen strategies were modeled using assumptions and published data. The primary outcome was the difference in costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) between the two cohorts, representing the potential budget for a screening program. One-way sensitivity analysis was performed for several key parameters.
RESULTS: The No-Screen arm was dominated with an incremental cost of $258 and an incremental effectiveness of -0.0414 QALYs. Using the $75,000/QALY metric, the maximum allowable budget for a screening program equals $3,363 ($258 + $3,105) per screened person over a 40-year time course.
CONCLUSION: Given the significant health benefits and financial savings via early detection in the screened cohort, a community-based screening program targeting high-risk males is likely to be cost-effective. Copyright &© 2011 The American Laryngological, Rhinological, and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21384383      PMCID: PMC3082601          DOI: 10.1002/lary.21412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  30 in total

1.  Evaluation of a screening test for the early detection of oral cancer and precancer.

Authors:  J A Jullien; M C Downer; J M Zakrzewska; P M Speight
Journal:  Community Dent Health       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.349

2.  An interim determination of health gain from oral cancer and precancer screening: 1. Obtaining health state utilities.

Authors:  M C Downer; J A Jullien; P M Speight
Journal:  Community Dent Health       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.349

3.  A randomized study of inpatient versus outpatient continuous infusion chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  E E Vokes; R L Schilsky; K E Choi; D M Magid; C M Guarnieri; S M Whaling; M J Ratain; R R Weichselbaum; W R Panje
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  The Markov process in medical prognosis.

Authors:  J R Beck; S G Pauker
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 5.  Oral leukoplakia: a clinicopathological review.

Authors:  I van der Waal; K P Schepman; E H van der Meij; L E Smeele
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.337

6.  Attendance and compliance at an oral cancer screening programme in a general medical practice.

Authors:  J A Jullien; J M Zakrzewska; M C Downer; P M Speight
Journal:  Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol       Date:  1995-05

7.  Oral leukoplakia and malignant transformation. A follow-up study of 257 patients.

Authors:  S Silverman; M Gorsky; F Lozada
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Surgical treatment of stage I and II oral squamous cell carcinomas: analysis of causes of failure.

Authors:  S Shingaki; T Kobayashi; I Suzuki; M Kohno; T Nakajima
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.651

9.  Toward consistency in cost-utility analyses: using national measures to create condition-specific values.

Authors:  M R Gold; P Franks; K I McCoy; D G Fryback
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Reproducibility and validity of oral visual inspection by trained health workers in the detection of oral precancer and cancer.

Authors:  B Mathew; R Sankaranarayanan; K B Sunilkumar; B Kuruvila; P Pisani; M K Nair
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  10 in total

1.  Knowledge and screening of head and neck cancer among American Indians in South Dakota.

Authors:  Sunshine Dwojak; Daniel Deschler; Michele Sargent; Kevin Emerick; B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Daniel Petereit
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Effectiveness of mouth self-examination for screening of oral premalignant/malignant diseases in tribal population of Dehradun district.

Authors:  Amit Shah; Bharat Bhushan; Saifullah Akhtar; Pankaj Kumar Singh; Madhur Garg; Mayank Gupta
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-08-25

3.  Cost-utility analysis of the screening program for early oral cancer detection in Thailand.

Authors:  Chutima Kumdee; Wantanee Kulpeng; Yot Teerawattananon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The economic burden of oral cancer in Iran.

Authors:  Aziz Rezapour; Reza Jahangiri; Alireza Olyaeemanesh; Bita Kalaghchi; Mojtaba Nouhi; Azin Nahvijou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Molecular Biomarkers Related to Oral Carcinoma: Clinical Trial Outcome Evaluation in a Literature Review.

Authors:  Gabriele Cervino; Luca Fiorillo; Alan Scott Herford; Umberto Romeo; Alberto Bianchi; Salvatore Crimi; Cesare D'Amico; Rosa De Stefano; Giuseppe Troiano; Rossella Santoro; Luigi Laino; Gregorio Laino; Marco Cicciù
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 3.434

Review 6.  Targets for improving disparate head and neck cancer outcomes in the low-income population.

Authors:  Payam Entezami; Bennett Thomas; Jobran Mansour; Ameya Asarkar; Cherie-Ann Nathan; John Pang
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-19

7.  The salivary metatranscriptome as an accurate diagnostic indicator of oral cancer.

Authors:  Guruduth Banavar; Oyetunji Ogundijo; Ryan Toma; Sathyapriya Rajagopal; Yen Kai Lim; Kai Tang; Francine Camacho; Pedro J Torres; Stephanie Gline; Matthew Parks; Liz Kenny; Ally Perlina; Hal Tily; Nevenka Dimitrova; Salomon Amar; Momchilo Vuyisich; Chamindie Punyadeera
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 8.617

8.  Screening for oral potentially malignant disorders among areca (betel) nut chewers in Guam and Saipan.

Authors:  Yvette C Paulino; Eric L Hurwitz; Saman Warnakulasuriya; Robert R Gatewood; Kenneth D Pierson; Lynnette F Tenorio; Rachel Novotny; Neal A Palafox; Lynne R Wilkens; Grazyna Badowski
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 9.  Value within otolaryngology: Assessment of the cost-utility analysis literature.

Authors:  Krupa R Patel; David J Phillips; Jason M Leibowitz; Theresa Scognamiglio; Victoria E Banuchi; William I Kuhel; David I Kutler; Marc A Cohen
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-01-26

10.  A prospective study to determine the cost of illness for oral cancer in India.

Authors:  Arjun Gurmeet Singh; Devendra Chaukar; Sudeep Gupta; C S Pramesh; Richard Sullivan; Pankaj Chaturvedi; Rajendra Badwe
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2021-06-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.