Literature DB >> 21384191

Restoration of intestinal continuity after Hartmann's procedure--not a benign operation. Are there predictors for morbidity?

Dalibor Antolovic1, Christoph Reissfelder, Timur Ozkan, Luis Galindo, Markus W Büchler, Moritz Koch, Jürgen Weitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Restoration of intestinal continuity is usually the second step after Hartmann's procedure and an established procedure in abdominal surgery, particularly for complicated diverticular disease. This descriptive study aimed to examine the morbidity and mortality associated with the procedure and to define potential risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 161 consecutive patients (median age 62 years, median BMI 25.2) undergoing elective surgery with restoration of bowel continuity between October 2001 and November 2008 at the Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, were included in this study. The association of potential prognostic variables with postoperative morbidity and mortality were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: The median time between the initial operation and the restoration of bowel continuity was 7 months. The median operation time was 185 min with a blood loss of 150 ml and median postoperative hospital stay of 9 days. Fifty-one percent of the patients had an uneventful recovery, whereas 49% had a postoperative complication. Surgical infections occurred in 18% of patients, 3.8% suffered from anastomotic leakage, and surgical re-exploration was necessary in 11.2%. Medical complications occurred in 21.1% of the patients, with pneumonia in 2.5% and urinary tract infections in 1.3%. One patient died 17 days after surgery. Univariate analysis showed that patients taking immunosuppressant drugs had significantly more wound infections and, interestingly, protective ileostomy was associated with postoperative anastomotic stenosis in our cohort. The administration of PRBC and a prolonged hospital were significantly associated with increased postoperative morbidity in the multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Restoration of bowel continuity is a surgical procedure with high overall morbidity. The high morbidity confirmed in our study and various other papers justify a randomized clinical study to investigate the one-stage concept with primary anastomosis against the Hartmann's procedure and its reversal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21384191     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-011-0763-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  30 in total

1.  Practice parameters for the treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis. The Standards Task Force. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.

Authors: 
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 2.  Primary resection with anastomosis vs. Hartmann's procedure in nonelective surgery for acute colonic diverticulitis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vasilis A Constantinides; Paris P Tekkis; Thanos Athanasiou; Omer Aziz; Sanjay Purkayastha; Feza H Remzi; Victor W Fazio; Nail Aydin; Ara Darzi; Asha Senapati
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Transfusion increases the risk of postoperative infection after cardiovascular surgery.

Authors:  Michael K Banbury; Mariano E Brizzio; Jeevanantham Rajeswaran; Bruce W Lytle; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Analysis of the factors related to the decision of restoring intestinal continuity after Hartmann's procedure.

Authors:  Cristina Roque-Castellano; Joaquin Marchena-Gomez; Marion Hemmersbach-Miller; Asuncion Acosta-Merida; Alvaro Rodriguez-Mendez; Roberto Fariña-Castro; Juan Hernandez-Romero
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Epidemiology of diverticular disease.

Authors:  Stephanie Jun; Neil Stollman
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.043

6.  Perioperative blood transfusion and albumin administration are independent risk factors for the development of postoperative infections after colorectal surgery.

Authors:  M G Torchia; R G Danzinger
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Multicentre, randomized clinical trial of primary versus secondary sigmoid resection in generalized peritonitis complicating sigmoid diverticulitis.

Authors:  G Zeitoun; A Laurent; F Rouffet; J Hay; A Fingerhut; J Paquet; C Peillon; T F Research
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Feasibility and morbidity of reversal of Hartmann's.

Authors:  S Banerjee; A J M Leather; J A Rennie; N Samano; J G Gonzalez; S Papagrigoriadis
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 9.  Malignant obstruction of the left colon.

Authors:  G T Deans; Z H Krukowski; S T Irwin
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 10.  Reversal of Hartmann's procedure: effect of timing and technique on ease and safety.

Authors:  J O Keck; B T Collopy; P J Ryan; R Fink; J R Mackay; R J Woods
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted approach for reversal of Hartmann's procedure: results from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database.

Authors:  Jeanine Arkenbosch; Hiromichi Miyagaki; H M C Shantha Kumara; Xiaohong Yan; Vesna Cekic; Richard L Whelan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann's reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Valerio Celentano; Mariano Cesare Giglio; Luigi Bucci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Resection enterostomy versus Hartmann's procedure for emergency colonic resections.

Authors:  M Grott; K Horisberger; C Weiß; P Kienle; J Hardt
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Reversal of Hartmann's procedure: still a complicated operation.

Authors:  N Horesh; Y Rudnicki; Y Dreznik; A P Zbar; M Gutman; O Zmora; D Rosin
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Hartmann's reversal after colonic perforation or anastomosis leakage, is it the same procedure? A retrospective study of 150 patients.

Authors:  Nathalie Chereau; Jeremie H Lefevre; Najim Chafai; Thevy Hor; Clotilde Debove; Emmanuel Tiret; Yann Parc
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Hartmann's procedure, reversal and rate of stoma-free survival.

Authors:  S Hallam; B S Mothe; Rmr Tirumulaju
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 7.  A historical review of surgery for peritonitis secondary to acute colonic diverticulitis: from Lockhart-Mummery to evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Roberto Cirocchi; Sorena Afshar; Salomone Di Saverio; Georgi Popivanov; Angelo De Sol; Francesca Gubbiotti; Gregorio Tugnoli; Massimo Sartelli; Fausto Catena; David Cavaliere; Renata Taboła; Abe Fingerhut; Gian Andrea Binda
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Laparoscopic Hartmann's Reversal: Application of a Single-Port Approach Through the Colostomy Site.

Authors:  Byung Mo Kang; Chang Woo Kim; Suk-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2020-12-04

9.  The factors that affect the mortality of emergency operated ASA 3 colon cancer patients.

Authors:  Yeliz Yilmaz; Fevzi Cengiz; Erdinç Kamer; Turan Acar; Emine Özlem Gür; Halis Bag; Yasin Peker; Kemal Atahan
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-08-17

10.  COLOSTOMY CLOSURE: RISK FACTORS FOR COMPLICATIONS.

Authors:  Alexandre Z Fonseca; Edson Uramoto; Otto M Santos-Rosa; Stephanie Santin; Marcelo Ribeiro
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.