Literature DB >> 17256137

Analysis of the factors related to the decision of restoring intestinal continuity after Hartmann's procedure.

Cristina Roque-Castellano1, Joaquin Marchena-Gomez, Marion Hemmersbach-Miller, Asuncion Acosta-Merida, Alvaro Rodriguez-Mendez, Roberto Fariña-Castro, Juan Hernandez-Romero.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hartmann's operation is widely used for the surgical treatment of complicated left colonic disease. However, many patients never undergo reanastomosis. This study analyzes the factors related to the decision of restoring intestinal continuity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1997 and 2004, 162 patients underwent Hartmann's operation in our institution. Age, sex, anesthetic risk evaluation (ASA score), underlying disorder (neoplastic vs non-neoplastic), prevalence of colonic reconstruction, as well as postoperative length of hospital stay, perioperative mortality and complications due to the latter procedure were analyzed. Long-term survival was also recorded.
RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 68.7 years (SD +/- 14.9); 104 were men (64.2%) and 58 were women (35.8%). Hartmann's operation mortality was 20.4%. Forty-two colonic continuity restorations were performed (25.9%). Mean time until reconstruction procedure was 13.3 months. There were no deaths (mortality 0%), but 23 cases suffered complications (54.8%). No suture dehiscence was observed. Estimated probability of being alive 1, 3, and 5 years after the initial operation was 64.1, 50.4, and 44.3%, respectively. Significant univariate predictors of reversal were male sex (p = 0.003), non-neoplastic disorder (p = 0.004), younger age (p = 0.001) and lower anesthetic risk (p = 0.009). In the multivariate analysis, independent predictive factors were age (OR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91-0.98), non-neoplastic disorder (OR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.05-0.45), and lower anesthetic risk (OR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.08-0.58).
CONCLUSIONS: Hartmann's procedure implies a high mortality and a low percentage of restoration of intestinal continuity. In selected patients, closure of Hartmann's colostomy is a safe procedure, but has a significant morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17256137     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-007-0272-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  16 in total

1.  Timing and method of reversal of Hartmann's procedure.

Authors:  N W Pearce; S D Scott; S J Karran
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Restoration of digestive continuity after Hartmann's procedure.

Authors:  S Ayaon Albarran; Ch Simoens; H Takeh; P Mendes da Costa
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

3.  The utility of the Hartmann procedure.

Authors:  D C Desai; E J Brennan; J F Reilly; R D Smink
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  The Hartmann procedure. Extended indications in severe intra-abdominal infection.

Authors:  M Schein; G Decker
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  [Hartmann's procedure. Institutional experience with 92 consecutive cases].

Authors:  A González Ojeda; O Durán Ramos; J Avalos González; G Herrera Camacho; A Orozco Mosqueda; J L Gutiérrez de la Rosa; J M Hermosillo Sandoval
Journal:  Rev Gastroenterol Mex       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep

6.  Intraoperative colonic lavage and primary anastomosis in peritonitis and obstruction.

Authors:  S Biondo; E Jaurrieta; R Jorba; P Moreno; L Farran; F Borobia; C Bettonica; I Poves; E Ramos; F Alcobendas
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 7.  Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy.

Authors:  J Pachler; P Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-04-18

8.  Colostomy closure: impact of preoperative risk factors on morbidity.

Authors:  S G Ghorra; T P Rzeczycki; R Natarajan; V E Pricolo
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Impact of functional results on quality of life after rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Jaana H Vironen; Matti Kairaluoma; Anna-Mari Aalto; Ilmo H Kellokumpu
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Feasibility and morbidity of reversal of Hartmann's.

Authors:  S Banerjee; A J M Leather; J A Rennie; N Samano; J G Gonzalez; S Papagrigoriadis
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  29 in total

1.  Reversal of Hartmann's procedure through the stomal side: a new even more minimal invasive technique.

Authors:  Jefrey Vermeulen; Wietske Vrijland; Guido H H Mannaerts
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure.

Authors:  Valentino Fiscon; Giuseppe Portale; Antonio Mazzeo; Giovanni Migliorini; Flavio Frigo
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2014-09-28

Review 3.  Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann procedure: is it safe and feasible?

Authors:  Alessandra Lucchetta; Nicolò De Manzini
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-04-13

Review 4.  Reversal of Hartmann's procedure: still a complicated operation.

Authors:  N Horesh; Y Rudnicki; Y Dreznik; A P Zbar; M Gutman; O Zmora; D Rosin
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Hartmann's reversal after colonic perforation or anastomosis leakage, is it the same procedure? A retrospective study of 150 patients.

Authors:  Nathalie Chereau; Jeremie H Lefevre; Najim Chafai; Thevy Hor; Clotilde Debove; Emmanuel Tiret; Yann Parc
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Hartmann's reversal: factors affecting complications and outcomes.

Authors:  Stewart Whitney; Benjamin D Gross; Alex Mui; Sue Hahn; Blake Read; Joel Bauer
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Considerations for Hartmann's reversal and Hartmann's reversal outcomes-a multicenter study.

Authors:  Nir Horesh; Yonatan Lessing; Yaron Rudnicki; Ilan Kent; Haguy Kammar; Almog Ben-Yaacov; Yael Dreznik; Hagit Tulchinsky; Shmuel Avital; Eli Mavor; Nir Wasserberg; Hanoch Kashtan; Joseph M Klausner; Mordechai Gutman; Oded Zmora
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Factors affecting reversal following Hartmann's procedure: experience from two district general hospitals in the UK.

Authors:  Olukayode Matthew Tokode; Akinfemi Akingboye; Olujinmi Coker
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 9.  Conventional and laparoscopic reversal of the Hartmann procedure: a review of literature.

Authors:  Bryan Joost Marinus van de Wall; Werner A Draaisma; Esther S Schouten; Ivo A M J Broeders; Esther C J Consten
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Reversal of Hartmann's procedure following acute diverticulitis: is timing everything?

Authors:  Fergal J Fleming; Peter Gillen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.