Literature DB >> 21384122

A semi-structured clinical interview for psychosis sub-groups (SCIPS): development and psychometric properties.

Yoshihiro Kinoshita1, David Kingdon, Kuni Kinoshita, Sheeba Sarafudheen, Deepa Umadi, David Dayson, Lars Hansen, Shanaya Rathod, Richard B Ibbotson, Douglas Turkington, Toshi A Furukawa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical sub-groups of schizophrenia, namely drug related, traumatic, anxiety and stress sensitivity sub-types, have been proposed for use in research, training and practice. They were developed on the basis of clinical observation but have not yet been used in research or clinical practice to any great extent. AIMS: To develop a semi-structured clinical interview for psychosis sub-groups (SCIPS) and determine the best diagnostic criteria with the highest inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity for sub-grouping patients with schizophrenia according to a newly developed classification scheme.
METHODS: The SCIPS was developed based upon discussion with the clinician researchers who had developed and were using the sub-groups. Kappa coefficients were calculated between two independent diagnostic assessments with the SCIPS (for inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability, n = 20) and between the SCIPS diagnosis and the sub-groupings as determined independently with highest achievable validity (for concurrent validity, n = 21) for patients with schizophrenia. These inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity were compared among five different sets of diagnostic criteria to determine which was most reliable and valid.
RESULTS: A set of diagnostic criteria with the highest inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity was determined. Kappa coefficients (95% confidence interval) for the inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity were 0.93 (0.66-1.20) and 0.73 (0.47-1.00), respectively, with these diagnostic criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: The SCIPS is a promising tool with which to sub-group patients with schizophrenia according to this recently developed classification scheme. The semi-structured interview achieves acceptable inter-rater and test-retest reliability and concurrent validity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21384122     DOI: 10.1007/s00127-011-0357-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol        ISSN: 0933-7954            Impact factor:   4.328


  28 in total

1.  A semi-structured clinical interview for psychosis sub-groups (SCIPS): development and psychometric properties.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Kinoshita; David Kingdon; Kuni Kinoshita; Sheeba Sarafudheen; Deepa Umadi; David Dayson; Lars Hansen; Shanaya Rathod; Richard B Ibbotson; Douglas Turkington; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  The iowa structured psychiatric interview. Rationale, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  M T Tsuang; R F Woolson; J C Simpson
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl       Date:  1980

3.  Measurement of premorbid adjustment in chronic schizophrenia.

Authors:  H E Cannon-Spoor; S G Potkin; R J Wyatt
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  The Social Readjustment Rating Scale.

Authors:  T H Holmes; R H Rahe
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Comorbidity of substance abuse and schizophrenia: the role of pre-morbid adjustment.

Authors:  S Arndt; G Tyrrell; M Flaum; N C Andreasen
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 7.723

6.  Behavioural sensitization to daily life stress in psychosis.

Authors:  I Myin-Germeys; Ph Delespaul; J van Os
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.723

7.  Long-term stability of subtypes in schizophrenic disorders: a comparison of four diagnostic systems.

Authors:  A Deister; A Marneros
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 5.270

8.  Childhood abuse as a risk factor for psychotic experiences.

Authors:  I Janssen; L Krabbendam; M Bak; M Hanssen; W Vollebergh; R de Graaf; J van Os
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.392

Review 9.  What do people with psychosis think caused their psychosis? A Q methodology study.

Authors:  Robert Dudley; Jonna Siitarinen; Ian James; Guy Dodgson
Journal:  Behav Cogn Psychother       Date:  2009-01

Review 10.  Effects of cannabis use on outcomes of psychotic disorders: systematic review.

Authors:  Stanley Zammit; Theresa H M Moore; Anne Lingford-Hughes; Thomas R E Barnes; Peter B Jones; Margaret Burke; Glyn Lewis
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 9.319

View more
  4 in total

1.  A semi-structured clinical interview for psychosis sub-groups (SCIPS): development and psychometric properties.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Kinoshita; David Kingdon; Kuni Kinoshita; Sheeba Sarafudheen; Deepa Umadi; David Dayson; Lars Hansen; Shanaya Rathod; Richard B Ibbotson; Douglas Turkington; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  Fear of negative evaluation is associated with delusional ideation in non-clinical population and patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Kinoshita; David Kingdon; Kuni Kinoshita; Yuko Kinoshita; Kazuma Saka; Yumiko Arisue; David Dayson; Shutaro Nakaaki; Koji Fukuda; Keiko Yoshida; Scott Harris; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  Multinational comparative cross-sectional survey of views of medical students about acceptable terminology and subgroups in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Shanaya Rathod; Muhammad Irfan; Rachna Bhargava; Narsimha Pinninti; Joseph Scott; Haifa Mohammad Algahtani; Zhihua Guo; Rishab Gupta; Pallavi Nadkarni; Farooq Naeem; Fleur Howells; Katherine Sorsdahi; Kerensa Thorne; Victoria Osman-Hicks; Sasee Pallikadavath; Peter Phiri; Hannah Carr; Lizi Graves; David Kingdon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Better than mermaids and stray dogs? Subtyping auditory verbal hallucinations and its implications for research and practice.

Authors:  Simon McCarthy-Jones; Neil Thomas; Clara Strauss; Guy Dodgson; Nev Jones; Angela Woods; Chris R Brewin; Mark Hayward; Massoud Stephane; Jack Barton; David Kingdon; Iris E Sommer
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 9.306

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.