| Literature DB >> 21383924 |
Vafa David Amirkia1, Pan Qiubao.
Abstract
Although the ever-growing usage of antimicrobials in the fields of medicine, pharmacology, and microbiology have undoubtedly allowed for unprecedented advances in the scientific world, these advances are nevertheless accompanied by unprecedented challenges. Sharp increases in antibiotic usages have led to inefficient and wasteful usage practices. Bacterial resistances have dramatically increased and therefore hindered the effectiveness of traditional antibiotics, thus forcing many life-science professionals to turn to plant extracts and synthetic chemicals [1]. The Antimicrobial Index (TAMI) seeks to alleviate some of these mounting difficulties through the collection and centralization of relevant antimicrobial susceptibility data from journals. Data compiled for antimicrobials include: method of action, physical properties, resistance genes, side effects, and minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC50, MIC90 and/or ranges). TAMI currently contains data on 960 antimicrobials and over 24,000 microorganisms (3,500 unique strains) which were collected from over 400 pieces of published literature. Volume and scope of the index have been and will continue to increase and it is hoped that such an index will further foster international cooperation and communication of antimicrobial-related knowledge. TAMI can be accessed at: http://antibiotics.toku-e.com/.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21383924 PMCID: PMC3046041 DOI: 10.6026/97320630005365
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioinformation ISSN: 0973-2063
Figure 1Flowchart of construction of The Antimicrobial Index. Papers were primarily found through using MIC relevant keywords in Google scholar such as: antimicrobial, in vitro, MIC, and micro g/ml. Data sorting and filtration comprised of omitting irrelevant data such those pertaining to susceptibility percentages, overly complex experimental and/or synthetically prepared compounds, time-kill studies, and other non-MIC data. Errors and nomenclature variations in the primary text data became increasingly apparent through the entry, merging, and sorting of data in Microsoft Excel. Errors such as microorganism or antimicrobial misspellings were revised. Unit differences were standardized to µg/ml. Refined data was subsequently published into the online and print versions of TAMI.