Literature DB >> 21383467

An electronic nose in the discrimination of breath from smokers and non-smokers: a model for toxin exposure.

Z J Cheng1, G Warwick, D H Yates, P S Thomas.   

Abstract

Exhaled breath contains hundreds of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that may be used as non-invasive markers of lung disease. Electronic noses (e-noses) can analyse VOCs by composite nanosensor arrays with learning algorithms. This study investigated the use of an e-nose (Cyranose C320) to distinguish the breath of smokers from that of non-smokers. Smoking and non-smoking subjects exhaled from total lung capacity into a 2 L Tedlar bag and these samples were introduced offline to the e-nose in a random order. Two classes of breath, 'smoker' and 'non-smoker', were established and this model was then cross-validated. Principal component analysis then identified the maximal point of difference between classes. Smellprints of breath from smokers were separated from those of non-smokers (cross-validation value, 95%; Mahalanobis distance, 3.96). Subsequently, 15 smokers (mean age 37.9 ± 4.78 years, FEV(1) 3.15 ± 0.21 L), and 24 non-smokers (add mean age and FEV1 as for smokers) were sampled to revalidate the model. The e-nose correctly identified the smoking status in 37 of the 39 subjects. This demonstrates that the e-nose is simple to use in clinical practice and can differentiate the breath of smokers from that of non-smokers. It may prove to be a useful, non-invasive tool for further breath assessment of exposure to other inhaled noxious substances as well as disease monitoring.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21383467     DOI: 10.1088/1752-7155/3/3/036003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Breath Res        ISSN: 1752-7155            Impact factor:   3.262


  10 in total

Review 1.  Advances in electronic-nose technologies developed for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Alphus D Wilson; Manuela Baietto
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Evening and morning exhaled volatile compound patterns are different in obstructive sleep apnoea assessed with electronic nose.

Authors:  Laszlo Kunos; Andras Bikov; Zsofia Lazar; Beata Zita Korosi; Palma Benedek; Gyorgy Losonczy; Ildiko Horvath
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  Using a chemiresistor-based alkane sensor to distinguish exhaled breaths of lung cancer patients from subjects with no lung cancer.

Authors:  Jiunn-Liang Tan; Zheng-Xin Yong; Chong-Kin Liam
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Halitosis: a new definition and classification.

Authors:  M Aydin; C N Harvey-Woodworth
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Diagnosing GORD in Respiratory Medicine.

Authors:  Chris J Timms; Deborah H Yates; Paul S Thomas
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Carotta: Revealing Hidden Confounder Markers in Metabolic Breath Profiles.

Authors:  Anne-Christin Hauschild; Tobias Frisch; Jörg Ingo Baumbach; Jan Baumbach
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2015-06-10

7.  Computational methods for metabolomic data analysis of ion mobility spectrometry data-reviewing the state of the art.

Authors:  Anne-Christin Hauschild; Till Schneider; Josch Pauling; Kathrin Rupp; Mi Jang; Jörg Ingo Baumbach; Jan Baumbach
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2012-10-16

8.  Expiratory flow rate, breath hold and anatomic dead space influence electronic nose ability to detect lung cancer.

Authors:  Andras Bikov; Marton Hernadi; Beata Zita Korosi; Laszlo Kunos; Gabriella Zsamboki; Zoltan Sutto; Adam Domonkos Tarnoki; David Laszlo Tarnoki; Gyorgy Losonczy; Ildiko Horvath
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.317

Review 9.  The Role of Electronic Noses in Phenotyping Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Simone Scarlata; Panaiotis Finamore; Martina Meszaros; Silvano Dragonieri; Andras Bikov
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-11

10.  Machine Learning Analysis of Electronic Nose in a Transdiagnostic Community Sample With a Streamlined Data Collection Approach: No Links Between Volatile Organic Compounds and Psychiatric Symptoms.

Authors:  Bohan Xu; Mahdi Moradi; Rayus Kuplicki; Jennifer L Stewart; Brett McKinney; Sandip Sen; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.157

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.