Literature DB >> 21383366

More than four in five office-based physicians could qualify for federal electronic health record incentives.

Brian K Bruen1, Leighton Ku, Matthew F Burke, Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin.   

Abstract

Our analyses of federal survey data show that more than four in five office-based physicians could qualify for new federal incentive payments to encourage the adoption and "meaningful use" of electronic health records, based on the numbers of Medicare or Medicaid patients they see. The incentives are thus likely to accelerate the spread of electronic health records. However, our analyses also indicate that eligibility for the incentives is likely to vary by specialty: 90.6 percent of physicians working in general or family practice or internal medicine could qualify for incentives, but fewer than two-thirds of pediatricians, obstetrician-gynecologists, and psychiatrists may qualify. Eligibility and use will also vary by factors such as size and type of practice; physicians in solo practice are much less likely to use electronic health records than physicians in other practice settings. We suggest actions that policy makers can take to lessen disparities and increase the adoption and meaningful use of electronic health records.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21383366     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  9 in total

1.  Use of health information technology by office-based physicians: comparison of two contemporaneous public-use physician surveys.

Authors:  Chenghui Li
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2011-10-01

2.  Impact of the HITECH Act on physicians' adoption of electronic health records.

Authors:  Stephen T Mennemeyer; Nir Menachemi; Saurabh Rahurkar; Eric W Ford
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Pilot study of meaningful use of electronic health records in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Xinglei Shen; Adam P Dicker; Laura Doyle; Timothy N Showalter; Amy S Harrison; Susan I DesHarnais
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Variation in electronic health record adoption and readiness for meaningful use: 2008-2011.

Authors:  Vaishali Patel; Eric Jamoom; Chun-Ju Hsiao; Michael F Furukawa; Melinda Buntin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Electronic Health Record Use a Bitter Pill for Many Physicians.

Authors:  Stephen L Meigs; Michael Solomon
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2016-01-01

6.  Disparities in Primary Care EHR Adoption Rates.

Authors:  Dominic Mack; Shun Zhang; Megan Douglas; Charles Sow; Harry Strothers; George Rust
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2016-02

7.  Awareness and management of chronic disease, insurance status, and health professional shortage areas in the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS): a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Raegan W Durant; Gaurav Parmar; Faisal Shuaib; Anh Le; Todd M Brown; David L Roth; Martha Hovater; Jewell H Halanych; James M Shikany; Ronald J Prineas; Tandaw J Samdarshi; Monika M Safford
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Review of quality assessment tools for the evaluation of pharmacoepidemiological safety studies.

Authors:  George A Neyarapally; Tarek A Hammad; Simone P Pinheiro; Solomon Iyasu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems.

Authors:  Nir Menachemi; Taleah H Collum
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2011-05-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.