Literature DB >> 21382032

Quality of randomised controlled trials in dentistry.

Iacopo Cioffi1, Mauro Farella.   

Abstract

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are regarded as the best study designs to test the efficacy of medical and dental intervention. Many reports, however, have shown that at the moment the quality of dental RCT reports is still poor, and further efforts to improve it are necessary. It has been suggested that trials that are not well designed provide biased estimates of the treatment effects and that a journal's impact factor is not related to the quality of RCTs published. For these reasons, before trusting RCT reports, a careful assessment of the study selected is needed. Randomisation, blinding, allocation concealment, drop outs analysis are essential quality components of RCTs. Many systems for RCTs quality assessment are available. In this report the concept of quality of RCTs will be critically evaluated and the most commonly used instruments available for quality assessment of RCTs in dental research will be reviewed.
© 2011 FDI World Dental Federation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21382032      PMCID: PMC9374841          DOI: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00007.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Dent J        ISSN: 0020-6539            Impact factor:   2.607


  36 in total

Review 1.  The art of quality assessment of RCTs included in systematic reviews.

Authors:  A P Verhagen; H C de Vet; R A de Bie; M Boers; P A van den Brandt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Clinical trials in orthodontics II: assessment of the quality of reporting of clinical trials published in three orthodontic journals between 1989 and 1998.

Authors:  J E Harrison
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2003-12

3.  Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in the intensive care literature. A systematic analysis of papers published in Intensive Care Medicine over 26 years.

Authors:  Nicola Latronico; Marco Botteri; Cosetta Minelli; Cinzia Zanotti; Guido Bertolini; Andrea Candiani
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-06-13       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  A review of treatment interventions in whiplash-associated disorders.

Authors:  Aris Seferiadis; Mark Rosenfeld; Ronny Gunnarsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  An evidence-based review on the validity of the Kaltenborn rule as applied to the glenohumeral joint.

Authors:  Corlia Brandt; Gisela Sole; Maria W Krause; Mariette Nel
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2006-06-13

6.  Randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery: survey of output and quality of reporting.

Authors:  Vasu Karri
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Methodological differences in clinical trials evaluating nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatments of hip and knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutron; Florence Tubach; Bruno Giraudeau; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials. Current issues and future directions.

Authors:  D Moher; A R Jadad; P Tugwell
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.188

9.  Violation of the intent-to-treat principle and rate of missing data in superiority trials assessing structural outcomes in rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Gabriel Baron; Isabelle Boutron; Bruno Giraudeau; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2005-06

Review 10.  Osteotomy for treating knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  R W Brouwer; T S C Jakma; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra; A P Verhagen; Jan Verhaar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-01-25
View more
  4 in total

1.  Review of High Level Endodontic Research in PubMed Index Journals from Iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Jafar Eghbal; Hassan Torabzadeh
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2012-08-01

2.  Critical appraisal of reporting randomized clinical trials published in Iranian dental journals during 2003-2010.

Authors:  Raha Habib Agahi; Nader Navabi; Arash Shahravan; Amirreza Ghassemi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2014-05-31

3.  Risk of bias and reporting completeness of randomised controlled trials in burn care: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Amber Young; Barnaby C Reeves; Hung-Yuan Cheng; Jason Wasiak; Duncan Muir; Anna Davies; Jane Blazeby
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  A systematic review of outcome measurements and quality of studies evaluating fixed tooth-supported restorations.

Authors:  Devangkumar Rajnikant Patel; Tim O'Brien; Aviva Petrie; Haralampos Petridis
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 2.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.