Literature DB >> 21381860

Simultaneous contrast: evidence from licking microstructure and cross-solution comparisons.

Dominic M Dwyer1, Emma S Lydall, Andrew J Hayward.   

Abstract

The microstructure of rats' licking responses was analyzed to investigate both "classic" simultaneous contrast (e.g., Flaherty & Largen, 1975) and a novel discrete-trial contrast procedure where access to an 8% test solution of sucrose was preceded by a sample of either 2%, 8%, or 32% sucrose (Experiments 1 and 2, respectively). Consumption of a given concentration of sucrose was higher when consumed alongside a low rather than high concentration comparison solution (positive contrast) and consumption of a given concentration of sucrose was lower when consumed alongside a high rather than a low concentration comparison solution (negative contrast). Furthermore, positive contrast increased the size of lick clusters while negative contrast decreased the size of lick clusters. Lick cluster size has a positive monotonic relationship with the concentration of palatable solutions and so positive and negative contrasts produced changes in lick cluster size that were analogous to raising or lowering the concentration of the test solution respectively. Experiment 3 utilized the discrete-trial procedure and compared contrast between two solutions of the same type (sucrose-sucrose or maltodextrin-maltodextrin) or contrast across solutions (sucrose-maltodextrin or maltodextrin-sucrose). Contrast effects on consumption were present, but reduced in size, in the cross-solution conditions. Moreover, lick cluster sizes were not affected at all by cross-solution contrasts as they were by same-solution contrasts. These results are consistent with the idea that simultaneous contrast effects depend, at least partially, on sensory mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21381860     DOI: 10.1037/a0021458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  7 in total

1.  Reduced palatability in drug-induced taste aversion: II. Aversive and rewarding unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  Joe Arthurs; Jian-You Lin; Leslie Renee Amodeo; Steve Reilly
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Assessing behavioral control across reinforcer solutions on a fixed-ratio schedule of reinforcement in rats.

Authors:  Joel E Shillinglaw; Ian K Everitt; Donita L Robinson
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.405

3.  Microstructural analysis of rat ethanol and water drinking patterns using a modified operant self-administration model.

Authors:  Stacey L Robinson; Brian A McCool
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-05-31

4.  Microstructural analysis of negative anticipatory contrast: A reconsideration of the devaluation account.

Authors:  Rebecca L Wright; Gary Gilmour; Dominic M Dwyer
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 5.  Characterizing ingestive behavior through licking microstructure: Underlying neurobiology and its use in the study of obesity in animal models.

Authors:  Alexander W Johnson
Journal:  Int J Dev Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.457

6.  Effects of nucleus accumbens insulin inactivation on microstructure of licking for glucose and saccharin in male and female rats.

Authors:  Kenneth D Carr; Sydney P Weiner
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2022-03-02

7.  Lickometry: A novel and sensitive method for assessing functional deficits in rats after stroke.

Authors:  Jewel Ahmed; Dominic M Dwyer; Tracy D Farr; David J Harrison; Stephen B Dunnett; Rebecca C Trueman
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 6.200

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.