Literature DB >> 21381051

Consideration of dosimetry in evaluation of ToxCast™ data.

Lesa L Aylward1, Sean M Hays.   

Abstract

The US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Toxcast™ program has the stated goal of predicting hazard, characterizing toxicity pathways and prioritizing the toxicity testing of environmental chemicals through the use of in vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays. This analysis integrates data from biomonitoring and from in vivo toxicity and pharmacokinetic studies to examine the physiological relevance of the tested and responding in vitro concentrations for five case study chemicals: triclosan, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, perfluorooctanoic acid, monobutyl phthalate and mono-2(ethylhexyl)phthalate. This analysis also examines the ToxCast™ phase 1 data set for approximately 50 chemicals belonging to four 'common mechanism groups' which have been the subject of cumulative risk assessments by the US EPA for both the pattern of key responses and the relative potencies of included chemicals compared with the in vivo relative potencies. Responding concentrations in vitro were generally in the range of serum or plasma concentrations associated with no-observed to lowest-observed effect levels for the case study chemicals, while available biomonitoring data demonstrating actual exposures were generally lower. ToxCast™ assay endpoints related to acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition had low sensitivity for detecting organophosphate pesticides but good sensitivity for detecting N-methyl carbamates. However, in vitro relative potencies did not correlate with in vivo potency. Both qualitative and quantitative predictive power is probably affected by the lack of comprehensive metabolic activity in most current in vitro systems explored in the ToxCast™ program, and this remains a fundamental challenge for high-throughput toxicity screening efforts. 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21381051     DOI: 10.1002/jat.1626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Toxicol        ISSN: 0260-437X            Impact factor:   3.446


  8 in total

1.  Identifying populations sensitive to environmental chemicals by simulating toxicokinetic variability.

Authors:  Caroline L Ring; Robert G Pearce; R Woodrow Setzer; Barbara A Wetmore; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Implementing in vitro bioactivity data to modernize priority setting of chemical inventories.

Authors:  Marc A Beal; Matthew Gagne; Sunil A Kulkarni; Grace Patlewicz; Russell S Thomas; Tara S Barton-Maclaren
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 6.043

Review 3.  IVIVE: Facilitating the Use of In Vitro Toxicity Data in Risk Assessment and Decision Making.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Chang; Yu-Mei Tan; David G Allen; Shannon Bell; Paul C Brown; Lauren Browning; Patricia Ceger; Jeffery Gearhart; Pertti J Hakkinen; Shruti V Kabadi; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Annie Lumen; Joanna Matheson; Alicia Paini; Heather A Pangburn; Elijah J Petersen; Emily N Reinke; Alexandre J S Ribeiro; Nisha Sipes; Lisa M Sweeney; John F Wambaugh; Ronald Wange; Barbara A Wetmore; Moiz Mumtaz
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-05-01

Review 4.  Triclosan: A Widespread Environmental Toxicant with Many Biological Effects.

Authors:  Mei-Fei Yueh; Robert H Tukey
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 13.820

5.  httk: R Package for High-Throughput Toxicokinetics.

Authors:  Robert G Pearce; R Woodrow Setzer; Cory L Strope; John F Wambaugh; Nisha S Sipes
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 6.440

6.  Utility of In Vitro Bioactivity as a Lower Bound Estimate of In Vivo Adverse Effect Levels and in Risk-Based Prioritization.

Authors:  Katie Paul Friedman; Matthew Gagne; Lit-Hsin Loo; Panagiotis Karamertzanis; Tatiana Netzeva; Tomasz Sobanski; Jill A Franzosa; Ann M Richard; Ryan R Lougee; Andrea Gissi; Jia-Ying Joey Lee; Michelle Angrish; Jean Lou Dorne; Stiven Foster; Kathleen Raffaele; Tina Bahadori; Maureen R Gwinn; Jason Lambert; Maurice Whelan; Mike Rasenberg; Tara Barton-Maclaren; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Incorporating new technologies into toxicity testing and risk assessment: moving from 21st century vision to a data-driven framework.

Authors:  Russell S Thomas; Martin A Philbert; Scott S Auerbach; Barbara A Wetmore; Michael J Devito; Ila Cote; J Craig Rowlands; Maurice P Whelan; Sean M Hays; Melvin E Andersen; M E Bette Meek; Lawrence W Reiter; Jason C Lambert; Harvey J Clewell; Martin L Stephens; Q Jay Zhao; Scott C Wesselkamper; Lynn Flowers; Edward W Carney; Timothy P Pastoor; Dan D Petersen; Carole L Yauk; Andy Nong
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Insights and perspectives on emerging inputs to weight of evidence determinations for food safety: workshop proceedings.

Authors:  Heidi Bialk; Craig Llewellyn; Alison Kretser; Richard Canady; Richard Lane; Jeffrey Barach
Journal:  Int J Toxicol       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.032

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.