Literature DB >> 21380772

Cost-effectiveness of treatment with etanercept for psoriasis in Sweden.

Christopher Knight1, Josephine Mauskopf, Mats Ekelund, Amitabh Singh, Shiyi Yang, Robert Boggs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness, from a Swedish societal perspective, of intermittent use of etanercept (Enbrel) with interruptions of use after 24 weeks compared to continuous use of adalimumab (Humira) as well as non-systemic standard of care in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.
METHODS: A Markov decision-tree model was constructed from clinical trials results. Patients starting etanercept, adalimumab, or non-systemic therapy moved through the model's 10-years horizon. Model input parameters included clinical response rates. Outcome measures included direct and indirect costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).
RESULTS: The incremental total (direct and indirect) costs per QALY were 1,559,939 kr (<euro>165,354) for adalimumab 40 mg every other week, compared with intermittent once-weekly Enbrel 50 mg, and 93,629 kr (<euro>9,925) for once-weekly intermittent etanercept 50 mg compared with non-systemic standard of care.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis showed that, with a 470,000 kr (<euro>50,000) per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, once-weekly etanercept 50 mg, used intermittently, is a cost-effective treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis compared with adalimumab and non-systemic standard of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21380772     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-010-0293-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  32 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of psoriasis. Part 2. Systemic therapies.

Authors:  M Lebwohl; S Ali
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 2.  Etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  N Woolacott; Y Bravo Vergel; N Hawkins; A Kainth; Z Khadjesari; K Misso; K Light; C Asseburg; S Palmer; K Claxton; I Bruce; M Sculpher; R Riemsma
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 3.  Cost-effectiveness of biologic treatments for psoriasis based on subjective and objective efficacy measures assessed over a 12-week treatment period.

Authors:  Andrew A Nelson; Daniel J Pearce; Alan B Fleischer; Rajesh Balkrishnan; Steven R Feldman
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  Economic evaluation of etanercept in the management of chronic plaque psoriasis.

Authors:  A Lloyd; P Reeves; P Conway; A Reynolds; G Baxter
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 9.302

5.  Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods.

Authors:  R G Newcombe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  The depression, anxiety, life satisfaction and affective expression levels in psoriasis patients.

Authors:  H Devrimci-Ozguven; T N Kundakci; H Kumbasar; A Boyvat
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 7.  Treatment of psoriasis. Part 1. Topical therapy and phototherapy.

Authors:  M Lebwohl; S Ali
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 11.527

8.  A global phase III randomized controlled trial of etanercept in psoriasis: safety, efficacy, and effect of dose reduction.

Authors:  K A Papp; S Tyring; M Lahfa; J Prinz; C E M Griffiths; A M Nakanishi; R Zitnik; P C M van de Kerkhof; Linda Melvin
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 9.  Ustekinumab for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis.

Authors:  E Gospodarevskaya; J Picot; K Cooper; E Loveman; A Takeda
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.014

10.  Clinical response in psoriasis patients discontinued from and then reinitiated on etanercept therapy.

Authors:  Kenneth B Gordon; Alice B Gottlieb; Craig L Leonardi; Boni E Elewski; Andrea Wang; Angelika Jahreis; Ralph Zitnik
Journal:  J Dermatolog Treat       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.359

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of treatments for psoriasis.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Nazrul Islam; Canice Ma; Aslam H Anis
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Etanercept and Adalimumab for Plaque Psoriasis not Associated with Arthritis.

Authors:  Juan Ruano; Beatriz Isla-Tejera; Rafael Jiménez-Puya; Ana Rodriguez-Martin; Manuel Cárdenas; Francisco Gómez; A Antonio Vélez; José R Del Prado-Llergo; José C Moreno-Giménez
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2013-07-06

Review 3.  Biologicals and small molecules in psoriasis: A systematic review of economic evaluations.

Authors:  Christian Kromer; Daniel Celis; Diana Sonntag; Wiebke K Peitsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Psoriasis Treatment Modalities in Malaysia.

Authors:  Nor Azmaniza Azizam; Aniza Ismail; Saperi Sulong; Norazirah Md Nor
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2019-07-01

Review 5.  Treatment sequencing after failure of the first biologic in cost-effectiveness models of psoriasis: a systematic review of published models and clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Josephine Mauskopf; Miny Samuel; Doreen McBride; Usha G Mallya; Steven R Feldman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Etanercept protects rat cardiomyocytes against hypertrophy by regulating inflammatory cytokines secretion and cell apoptosis.

Authors:  Q Li; Q Yu; R Na; B Liu
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.590

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.