Literature DB >> 18808413

Economic evaluation of etanercept in the management of chronic plaque psoriasis.

A Lloyd1, P Reeves, P Conway, A Reynolds, G Baxter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence has recommended that etanercept 25 mg twice weekly (biw) be used in adults with severe plaque psoriasis. However, its economic model did not consider the alternative licensed regimen of etanercept 50 mg biw.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness of etanercept 50 mg biw for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis, and to explore characteristics of patients who benefited most from 50 mg dosing.
METHODS: An economic model was constructed to estimate the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. The model considered patients with chronic plaque psoriasis who had both Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 10 or higher who were unable to take standard systemic therapies. Quality of life gain was estimated from the DLQI responses of patients enrolled in three clinical studies. The model considered expenditure on drugs, monitoring visits, adverse events and inpatient stays. Costs were estimated from the perspective of the U.K. National Health Service over a time period of 10 years.
RESULTS: The incremental cost per QALY for etanercept 50 mg biw compared with no systemic therapy was found to be 6217 pounds sterling (95% confidence interval 5396-7486 pounds sterling). The cost-effectiveness of 50 mg dosing was more attractive in patients with baseline PASI > or = 20 (5163 pounds sterling) or baseline DLQI > or = 20 (4599 pounds sterling).
CONCLUSIONS: This model found the licensed dose regimen of etanercept 50 mg biw to be cost effective in the U.K. This regimen was particularly appropriate for patients with severe disease or poor quality of life at baseline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18808413     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08863.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  6 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of treatments for psoriasis.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Nazrul Islam; Canice Ma; Aslam H Anis
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Cost-effectiveness of treatment with etanercept for psoriasis in Sweden.

Authors:  Christopher Knight; Josephine Mauskopf; Mats Ekelund; Amitabh Singh; Shiyi Yang; Robert Boggs
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-03-06

3.  A cost-utility analysis of etanercept for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in Italy.

Authors:  Giorgio L Colombo; Sergio Di Matteo; Ketty Peris; Maria Concetta Fargnoli; Maria Esposito; Annamaria Mazzotta; Sergio Chimenti
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2009-10-15

4.  Mapping of the DLQI scores to EQ-5D utility values using ordinal logistic regression.

Authors:  Faraz Mahmood Ali; Richard Kay; Andrew Y Finlay; Vincent Piguet; Joerg Kupfer; Florence Dalgard; M Sam Salek
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Biologicals and small molecules in psoriasis: A systematic review of economic evaluations.

Authors:  Christian Kromer; Daniel Celis; Diana Sonntag; Wiebke K Peitsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Treatment sequencing after failure of the first biologic in cost-effectiveness models of psoriasis: a systematic review of published models and clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Josephine Mauskopf; Miny Samuel; Doreen McBride; Usha G Mallya; Steven R Feldman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.981

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.