Literature DB >> 21380586

How many pixels make a memory? Picture memory for small pictures.

Jeremy M Wolfe1, Yoana I Kuzmova.   

Abstract

Torralba (Visual Neuroscience, 26, 123-131, 2009) showed that, if the resolution of images of scenes were reduced to the information present in very small "thumbnail images," those scenes could still be recognized. The objects in those degraded scenes could be identified, even though it would be impossible to identify them if they were removed from the scene context. Can tiny and/or degraded scenes be remembered, or are they like brief presentations, identified but not remembered. We report that memory for tiny and degraded scenes parallels the recognizability of those scenes. You can remember a scene to approximately the degree to which you can classify it. Interestingly, there is a striking asymmetry in memory when scenes are not the same size on their initial appearance and subsequent test. Memory for a large, full-resolution stimulus can be tested with a small, degraded stimulus. However, memory for a small stimulus is not retrieved when it is tested with a large stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21380586      PMCID: PMC3098926          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0075-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  10 in total

1.  Scene memory is more detailed than you think: the role of categories in visual long-term memory.

Authors:  Talia Konkle; Timothy F Brady; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-10-04

2.  INTERFERENCE IN VISUAL RECOGNITION.

Authors:  J S BRUNER; M C POTTER
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-04-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Is visual attention required for robust picture memory?

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz; Kristin O Michod
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Influence of object size on baseline identification, priming, and explicit memory.

Authors:  Bob Uttl; Peter Graf; Amy L Siegenthaler
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2007-08

5.  How many pixels make an image?

Authors:  Antonio Torralba
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 3.241

6.  Conceptual distinctiveness supports detailed visual long-term memory for real-world objects.

Authors:  Talia Konkle; Timothy F Brady; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2010-08

7.  Size in the visual processing of faces and words.

Authors:  P A Kolers; R L Duchnicky; G Sundstroem
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Recognition of positive and negative bandpass-filtered images.

Authors:  T Hayes; M C Morrone; D C Burr
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Why is it easier to identify someone close than far away?

Authors:  Geoffrey R Loftus; Erin M Harley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

10.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Cue quality and criterion setting in recognition memory.

Authors:  Christopher Kent; Koen Lamberts; Richard Patton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

2.  Modulating human memory for complex scenes with artificially generated images.

Authors:  Cameron Kyle-Davidson; Adrian G Bors; Karla K Evans
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Larger images are better remembered during naturalistic encoding.

Authors:  Shaimaa Masarwa; Olga Kreichman; Sharon Gilaie-Dotan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.