OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) can replace gadolinium-enhanced MRI (Gd-MRI) for diagnosing liver metastases. The diagnostic accuracy of both techniques alone and in combination are compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with histologically proven primary extrahepatic tumors were included in this retrospective study. Lesions included 62 metastases and 130 benign lesions. Three image sets (unenhanced T1 and T2/gadolinium enhanced T1 (Gd-MRI), DWI and combination of both) were reviewed independently by 3 observers. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (A(z)), sensitivity and specificity for the 3 image sets were compared. The standard of reference was either histopathology or multi-modality and clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Pooled data showed higher diagnostic accuracy for the combined set (A(z)=0.93) compared to Gd-MRI (p=0.001) and DWI (p<0.0001). No difference was found between the performance of Gd-MRI and DWI (p=0.09). Sensitivity for the combined set was higher than Gd-MRI (p=0.0003) and DWI (p=0.0034). Specificity for DWI was lower than Gd-MRI (p<0.0001) and the combined set (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of DWI is equal to that of Gd-MRI. DWI alone can be used in patients where gadolinium contrast administration is not allowed. Combination of Gd-MRI and DWI significantly increases diagnostic accuracy.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) can replace gadolinium-enhanced MRI (Gd-MRI) for diagnosing liver metastases. The diagnostic accuracy of both techniques alone and in combination are compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with histologically proven primary extrahepatic tumors were included in this retrospective study. Lesions included 62 metastases and 130 benign lesions. Three image sets (unenhanced T1 and T2/gadolinium enhanced T1 (Gd-MRI), DWI and combination of both) were reviewed independently by 3 observers. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (A(z)), sensitivity and specificity for the 3 image sets were compared. The standard of reference was either histopathology or multi-modality and clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Pooled data showed higher diagnostic accuracy for the combined set (A(z)=0.93) compared to Gd-MRI (p=0.001) and DWI (p<0.0001). No difference was found between the performance of Gd-MRI and DWI (p=0.09). Sensitivity for the combined set was higher than Gd-MRI (p=0.0003) and DWI (p=0.0034). Specificity for DWI was lower than Gd-MRI (p<0.0001) and the combined set (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of DWI is equal to that of Gd-MRI. DWI alone can be used in patients where gadolinium contrast administration is not allowed. Combination of Gd-MRI and DWI significantly increases diagnostic accuracy.
Authors: Riccardo De Robertis; Paolo Tinazzi Martini; Emanuele Demozzi; Flavia Dal Corso; Claudio Bassi; Paolo Pederzoli; Mirko D'Onofrio Journal: World J Radiol Date: 2015-10-28
Authors: Stefano Palmucci; Letizia Antonella Mauro; Martina Messina; Brunella Russo; Giovanni Failla; Pietro Milone; Massimiliano Berretta; Giovanni Carlo Ettorre Journal: World J Radiol Date: 2012-07-28
Authors: Mariëlle J A Jansen; Hugo J Kuijf; Maarten Niekel; Wouter B Veldhuis; Frank J Wessels; Max A Viergever; Josien P W Pluim Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2019-10-15
Authors: Pier Paolo Mainenti; Federica Romano; Laura Pizzuti; Sabrina Segreto; Giovanni Storto; Lorenzo Mannelli; Massimo Imbriaco; Luigi Camera; Simone Maurea Journal: World J Radiol Date: 2015-07-28