Literature DB >> 21377289

Tolerability of combined modality therapy for rectal cancer in elderly patients aged 75 years and older.

Danielle N Margalit1, Harvey J Mamon, Marek Ancukiewicz, Wendy Kobayashi, David P Ryan, Lawrence S Blaszkowsky, Jeffrey Clark, Christopher G Willett, Theodore S Hong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the rate of treatment deviations during combined modality therapy for rectal cancer in elderly patients aged 75 years and older. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed the records of consecutively treated patients with rectal cancer aged 75 years and older treated with combined modality therapy at Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham & Women's Hospital from 2002 to 2007. The primary endpoint was the rate of treatment deviation, defined as a treatment break, dose reduction, early discontinuation of therapy, or hospitalization during combined modality therapy. Patient comorbidity was rated using the validated Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 Test (ACE-27) comorbidity index. Fisher's exact test and the Mantel-Haenszel trend test were used to identify predictors of treatment tolerability.
RESULTS: Thirty-six eligible patients had a median age of 79.0 years (range, 75-87 years); 53% (19/36) had no or mild comorbidity and 47% (17/36) had moderate or severe comorbidity. In all, 58% of patients (21/36) were treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and 33% (12/36) with postoperative CRT. Although 92% patients (33/36) completed the planned radiotherapy (RT) dose, 25% (9/36) required an RT-treatment break, 11% (4/36) were hospitalized, and 33% (12/36) had a dose reduction, break, or discontinuation of concurrent chemotherapy. In all, 39% of patients (14/36) completed≥4 months of adjuvant chemotherapy, and 17% (6/36) completed therapy without a treatment deviation. More patients with no to mild comorbidity completed treatment than did patients with moderate to severe comorbidity (21% vs. 12%, p=0.66). The rate of deviation did not differ between patients who had preoperative or postoperative CRT (19% vs. 17%, p=1.0).
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of elderly patients with rectal cancer in this series required early termination of treatment, treatment interruptions, or dose reductions. These data suggest that further intensification of combined modality therapy for rectal cancer should be performed with caution in elderly patients, who require aggressive supportive care to complete treatment.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21377289     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  19 in total

1.  Assessment of solid cancer treatment feasibility in older patients: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Marie Laurent; Elena Paillaud; Christophe Tournigand; Philippe Caillet; Aurélie Le Thuaut; Jean-Léon Lagrange; Olivier Beauchet; Hélène Vincent; Muriel Carvahlo-Verlinde; Stéphane Culine; Sylvie Bastuji-Garin; Florence Canouï-Poitrine
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-02-25

Review 2.  Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Treatment Approach in Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Francesca De Felice; Daniele Crocetti; Veronica Maiuri; Martina Parisi; Francesco Marampon; Luciano Izzo; Giorgio De Toma; Daniela Musio; Vincenzo Tombolini
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-01-11

3.  Toxicity and outcomes in older versus younger patients treated with trimodality therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Karen Wong; Elizabeth Handorf; Douglas Lee; Rishi Jain; Eddie Zhang; Harry S Cooper; Jeffrey M Farma; Efrat Dotan; Joshua E Meyer
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.599

4.  Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy in elderly patients: tolerance and compliance in a series of 137 patients.

Authors:  M Di Genesio Pagliuca; C Perotti; G Apicella; A Galla; M Guffi; M Paolini; L Donis; V Amisano; S Torrente; I Manfredda; M Krengli
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 5.  Recommendations and expert opinion on the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer in Spain.

Authors:  C Grávalos; P García-Alfonso; R Afonso; V Arrazubi; A Arrivi; J C Cámara; J Capdevila; A Gómez-España; A Lacasta; J L Manzano; M Salgado; J Sastre; E Díaz-Rubio
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 6.  Management of locally advanced rectal cancer in the elderly: a critical review and algorithm.

Authors:  Lara Hathout; Nell Maloney-Patel; Usha Malhotra; Shang-Jui Wang; Sita Chokhavatia; Ishita Dalal; Elizabeth Poplin; Salma K Jabbour
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-04

Review 7.  Controversies in the multimodality management of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Robert Díaz Beveridge; Dilara Akhoundova; Gema Bruixola; Jorge Aparicio
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer: adherence to evidence-based guidelines in clinical practice.

Authors:  Timothy L Fitzgerald; Tithe Biswas; Kevin O'Brien; Emmanuel E Zervos; Jan H Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Treatment of Rectal Cancer in Older Adults.

Authors:  Ayesha R Sheikh; Hassan Yameen; Kevan Hartshorn
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer in Patients Aged 75 Years and Older: Acute Toxicity, Compliance with Treatment, and Early Results.

Authors:  Valentine Guimas; Jihane Boustani; Benjamin Schipman; Nicolas Lescut; Marc Puyraveau; Jean François Bosset; Stéphanie Servagi-Vernat
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.