Literature DB >> 21377158

A model of a radially expanding and contracting lymphangion.

Elaheh Rahbar1, James E Moore.   

Abstract

The lymphatic system is an extensive vascular network featuring valves and contractile walls that pump interstitial fluid and plasma proteins back to the main circulation. Immune function also relies on the lymphatic system's ability to transport white blood cells. Failure to drain and pump this excess fluid results in edema characterized by fluid retention and swelling of limbs. It is, therefore, important to understand the mechanisms of fluid transport and pumping of lymphatic vessels. Unfortunately, there are very few studies in this area, most of which assume Poiseuille flow conditions. In vivo observations reveal that these vessels contract strongly, with diameter changes of the order of magnitude of the diameter itself over a cycle that lasts typically 2-3s. The radial velocity of the contracting vessel is on the order of the axial fluid velocity, suggesting that modeling flow in these vessels with a Poiseuille model is inappropriate. In this paper, we describe a model of a radially expanding and contracting lymphatic vessel and investigate the validity of assuming Poiseuille flow to estimate wall shear stress, which is presumably important for lymphatic endothelial cell mechanotransduction. Three different wall motions, periodic sinusoidal, skewed sinusoidal and physiologic wall motions, were investigated with steady and unsteady parabolic inlet velocities. Despite high radial velocities resulting from the wall motion, wall shear stress values were within 4% of quasi-static Poiseuille values. Therefore, Poiseuille flow is valid for the estimation of wall shear stress for the majority of the lymphangion contractile cycle.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21377158      PMCID: PMC3086717          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.02.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  12 in total

1.  Biomechanics of a lymphatic vessel.

Authors:  N P Reddy; T A Krouskop; P H Newell
Journal:  Blood Vessels       Date:  1975

2.  Simulation of a chain of collapsible contracting lymphangions with progressive valve closure.

Authors:  C D Bertram; C Macaskill; J E Moore
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Addressing the unmet needs in lymphedema risk management.

Authors:  Stanley G Rockson
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.589

4.  Intrinsic pump-conduit behavior of lymphangions.

Authors:  Christopher M Quick; Arun M Venugopal; Anatoliy A Gashev; David C Zawieja; Randolph H Stewart
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Lymph flow, shear stress, and lymphocyte velocity in rat mesenteric prenodal lymphatics.

Authors:  J Brandon Dixon; Steven T Greiner; Anatoliy A Gashev; Gerard L Cote; James E Moore; David C Zawieja
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2006 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  Lymphatic pump-conduit duality: contraction of postnodal lymphatic vessels inhibits passive flow.

Authors:  Christopher M Quick; Bruce L Ngo; Arun M Venugopal; Randolph H Stewart
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2009-01-02       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  Modeling flow in collecting lymphatic vessels: one-dimensional flow through a series of contractile elements.

Authors:  A J Macdonald; K P Arkill; G R Tabor; N G McHale; C P Winlove
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 4.733

8.  A computer model of the lymphatic system.

Authors:  N P Reddy; T A Krouskop; P H Newell
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 4.589

9.  Contractile physiology of lymphatics.

Authors:  David C Zawieja
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.589

Review 10.  Recent advances in breast cancer-related lymphedema of the arm: lymphatic pump failure and predisposing factors.

Authors:  Anthony W B Stanton; Stephanie Modi; Russell H Mellor; J Rodney Levick; Peter S Mortimer
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.589

View more
  21 in total

1.  Effects of dynamic shear and transmural pressure on wall shear stress sensitivity in collecting lymphatic vessels.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kornuta; Zhanna Nepiyushchikh; Olga Y Gasheva; Anish Mukherjee; David C Zawieja; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Confocal image-based computational modeling of nitric oxide transport in a rat mesenteric lymphatic vessel.

Authors:  John T Wilson; Wei Wang; Augustus H Hellerstedt; David C Zawieja; James E Moore
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Determinants of valve gating in collecting lymphatic vessels from rat mesentery.

Authors:  Michael J Davis; Elaheh Rahbar; Anatoliy A Gashev; David C Zawieja; James E Moore
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  The relationship between lymphangion chain length and maximum pressure generation established through in vivo imaging and computational modeling.

Authors:  Mohammad S Razavi; Tyler S Nelson; Zhanna Nepiyushchikh; Rudolph L Gleason; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  The advection of microparticles, MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells in response to very low Reynolds numbers.

Authors:  Sinéad T Morley; Michael T Walsh; David T Newport
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 2.800

6.  Development of a model of a multi-lymphangion lymphatic vessel incorporating realistic and measured parameter values.

Authors:  C D Bertram; C Macaskill; M J Davis; J E Moore
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2013-06-26

7.  Lymph transport in rat mesenteric lymphatics experiencing edemagenic stress.

Authors:  Elaheh Rahbar; Tony Akl; Gerard L Coté; James E Moore; David C Zawieja
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Dual-channel in-situ optical imaging system for quantifying lipid uptake and lymphatic pump function.

Authors:  Timothy Kassis; Alison B Kohan; Michael J Weiler; Matthew E Nipper; Rachel Cornelius; Patrick Tso; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Ex vivo lymphatic perfusion system for independently controlling pressure gradient and transmural pressure in isolated vessels.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kornuta; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 10.  Primary and secondary lymphatic valve development: molecular, functional and mechanical insights.

Authors:  Eleni Bazigou; John T Wilson; James E Moore
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.514

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.