Literature DB >> 2137704

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiographic left ventricular wall thickness and mass.

L M Prisant1, A A Carr.   

Abstract

In a highly select group of stable hypertensive patients, we have assessed the strength of association between various blood pressure measurements (24 h average automated ambulatory blood pressure, 4 h automated ambulatory morning average blood pressure, multiple office visit average blood pressure, and a single office visit average blood pressure) and various echocardiographic indices of hypertensive cardiac target organ damage (left atrial diameter, left ventricular end diastolic diameter, posterior wall thickness, combined wall thickness, relative wall thickness, left ventricular mass and mass index, and combined wall thickness/left ventricular diastolic diameter ratio). These data demonstrated that a single 24 h average diastolic blood pressure by automatic noninvasive ambulatory monitoring was a significantly better predictor of echocardiographic posterior wall thickness, combined wall thickness or relative wall thickness than the multiple office or single office average diastolic blood pressure. Also there were highly significant correlations between both 24 h average systolic and diastolic blood pressure and these echocardiographic parameters (in descending order of correlation coefficient): combined wall thickness, posterior wall thickness, combined wall thickness/left ventricular diastolic diameter, left ventricular mass index, relative wall thickness, and left ventricular mass. Left ventricular end diastolic dimension did not linearly correlate with any systolic or diastolic blood pressure measurement. Left atrial dimension demonstrated only a significant association with 24 h average diastolic blood pressure. Single office average blood pressure did not linearly correlate with any echocardiographic parameter.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2137704     DOI: 10.1093/ajh/3.2.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  6 in total

Review 1.  Endurance exercise training and treatment of hypertension. The controversy.

Authors:  R M Gilders; G A Dudley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Noninvasive 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: current status.

Authors:  A Stanton; E O'Brien
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for the assessment of nicardipine as a third drug in severe essential hypertension.

Authors:  Y Lacourcière; L Poirier; C Lévesque; P Provencher
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference: 2. Diagnosis of hypertension in adults.

Authors:  R B Haynes; Y Lacourcière; S W Rabkin; F H Leenen; A G Logan; N Wright; C E Evans
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Enemies and friends in high-tech places: the development and validation of the Online Social Experiences Measure.

Authors:  Robert G Kent de Grey; Bert N Uchino; Brian Rw Baucom; Timothy W Smith; Avery E Holton; Edward F Diener
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2019-09-23

6.  Prevalence of masked hypertension among kidney donors.

Authors:  A Kanakaraj; R Ravichandran
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2012-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.