BACKGROUND: Open-label oral immunotherapy (OIT) protocols have been used to treat small numbers of patients with peanut allergy. Peanut OIT has not been evaluated in double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of OIT for peanut allergy in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. METHODS: In this multicenter study, children ages 1 to 16 years with peanut allergy received OIT with peanut flour or placebo. Initial escalation, build-up, and maintenance phases were followed by an oral food challenge (OFC) at approximately 1 year. Titrated skin prick tests (SPTs) and laboratory studies were performed at regular intervals. RESULTS:Twenty-eight subjects were enrolled in the study. Three peanut OIT subjects withdrew early in the study because of allergic side effects. During the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge, all remaining peanut OIT subjects (n = 16) ingested the maximum cumulative dose of 5000 mg (approximately 20 peanuts), whereas placebo subjects (n = 9) ingested a median cumulative dose of 280 mg (range, 0-1900 mg; P < .001). In contrast with the placebo group, the peanut OIT group showed reductions in SPT size (P < .001), IL-5 (P = .01), and IL-13 (P = .02) and increases in peanut-specific IgG(4) (P < .001). Peanut OIT subjects had initial increases in peanut-specific IgE (P < .01) but did not show significant change from baseline by the time of OFC. The ratio of forkhead box protein 3 (FoxP3)(hi): FoxP3(intermediate) CD4+ CD25+ T cells increased at the time of OFC (P = .04) in peanut OIT subjects. CONCLUSION: These results conclusively demonstrate that peanut OIT induces desensitization and concurrent immune modulation. The current study continues and is evaluating the hypothesis that peanut OIT causes long-term immune tolerance.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Open-label oral immunotherapy (OIT) protocols have been used to treat small numbers of patients with peanutallergy. Peanut OIT has not been evaluated in double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of OIT for peanutallergy in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. METHODS: In this multicenter study, children ages 1 to 16 years with peanutallergy received OIT with peanut flour or placebo. Initial escalation, build-up, and maintenance phases were followed by an oral food challenge (OFC) at approximately 1 year. Titrated skin prick tests (SPTs) and laboratory studies were performed at regular intervals. RESULTS: Twenty-eight subjects were enrolled in the study. Three peanut OIT subjects withdrew early in the study because of allergic side effects. During the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge, all remaining peanut OIT subjects (n = 16) ingested the maximum cumulative dose of 5000 mg (approximately 20 peanuts), whereas placebo subjects (n = 9) ingested a median cumulative dose of 280 mg (range, 0-1900 mg; P < .001). In contrast with the placebo group, the peanut OIT group showed reductions in SPT size (P < .001), IL-5 (P = .01), and IL-13 (P = .02) and increases in peanut-specific IgG(4) (P < .001). Peanut OIT subjects had initial increases in peanut-specific IgE (P < .01) but did not show significant change from baseline by the time of OFC. The ratio of forkhead box protein 3 (FoxP3)(hi): FoxP3(intermediate) CD4+ CD25+ T cells increased at the time of OFC (P = .04) in peanut OIT subjects. CONCLUSION: These results conclusively demonstrate that peanut OIT induces desensitization and concurrent immune modulation. The current study continues and is evaluating the hypothesis that peanut OIT causes long-term immune tolerance.
Authors: Kamal D Srivastava; Jacob D Kattan; Zhong Mei Zou; Jing Hua Li; Libang Zhang; Sylvan Wallenstein; Joseph Goldfarb; Hugh A Sampson; Xiu-Min Li Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Corinne A Keet; Pamela A Frischmeyer-Guerrerio; Ananth Thyagarajan; John T Schroeder; Robert G Hamilton; Stephen Boden; Pamela Steele; Sarah Driggers; A Wesley Burks; Robert A Wood Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2011-11-30 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Laura I Salazar-Fontana; Dharmesh D Desai; Tarik A Khan; Renuka C Pillutla; Sandra Prior; Radha Ramakrishnan; Jennifer Schneider; Alexandra Joseph Journal: AAPS J Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: Brian P Vickery; Jelena P Berglund; Caitlin M Burk; Jason P Fine; Edwin H Kim; Jung In Kim; Corinne A Keet; Michael Kulis; Kelly G Orgel; Rishu Guo; Pamela H Steele; Yamini V Virkud; Ping Ye; Benjamin L Wright; Robert A Wood; A Wesley Burks Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 10.793