Literature DB >> 21377002

Randomized trial of NTrap for proximal ureteral stones.

Chung-Jing Wang1, Shi-Wei Huang, Chien-Hsing Chang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role, safety, and effectiveness of NTtrap stone occlusion device in prevention of stone migration in proximal ureteral lithotripsy and whether such a procedure has less morbidity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospectively randomized controlled trial was carried out from January 2008 and December 2009. A total of 113 patients undergoing ureteroscopic stone manipulation for proximal ureteral stones (>9 mm) completed the study protocol: 57 patients in the control group, and 56 patients in the NTtrap group. Preoperative data included urinalysis, urine culture, complete blood count, biochemistry study, renal ultrasound, and intravenous urography. Intraoperative findings and outcome were also recorded. The stone-free rate was assessed using ultrasound and plain radiograph of the kidney, ureter, and bladder in patients with calcified stones and noncontrast computerized tomography in patients with radiolucent stones.
RESULTS: There was no difference between the groups with regard to follow-up time, stone impaction, return to normal activity, unplanned emergency department visits and complications rate. However, patients in the control group had a significantly higher rate of stone retropulsion. Meanwhile, operative time, visual analog scale, and analgesic consumptions were significantly higher in the NTtrap group. No ureteral stricture developed in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that the NTtrap stone occlusion device is efficient at preventing stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy of proximal ureteral calculi.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21377002     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  9 in total

1.  Dual usage of a stone basket: Stone capture and retropulsion prevention.

Authors:  Tadeusz Kroczak; Daniela Ghiculete; Robert Sowerby; Michael Ordon; Jason Y Lee; Kenneth T Pace; John R Honey
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Preventing stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Osama M Elashry; Ahmad M Tawfik
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Does a retropulsion prevention device equalize the surgical success of Ho:YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripters for upper ureteral stones? A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Sahin Bagbanci; Mumtaz Dadali; Yeliz Dadalı; Levent Emir; Ozkan Gorgulu; Ayhan Karabulut
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Use of XenX™, the latest ureteric occlusion device with guide wire utility: results from a prospective multicentric comparative study.

Authors:  Francesco Sanguedolce; Emanuele Montanari; Mario Alvarez-Maestro; Nicola Macchione; Stephan Hruby; Athanasios Papatsoris; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Luca Villa; Patrick Honeck; Olivier Traxer; Francesco Greco
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Optimizing Stone-free Rates With Ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Thanmaya G Reddy; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2015

6.  The "Guidewire-Coil"-Technique to prevent retrograde stone migration of ureteric calculi during intracorporeal lithothripsy.

Authors:  Nici Markus Dreger; Friedrich Carl von Rundstedt; Stephan Roth; Alexander Sascha Brandt; Stephan Degener
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  The effect of stone size on the results of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of upper ureteric stones.

Authors:  Ahmed S El-Abd; Ahmed M Tawfeek; Shawky A El-Abd; Tarik A Gameel; Hasan H El-Tatawy; Magdy A El-Sabaa; Mohamed G Soliman
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2021-11-26

8.  Impact of forced diuresis on retropulsion of disintegrated ureteral calculi during semi-rigid ureteroscopy: a double-blind randomized-controlled study.

Authors:  Essam A Shalaby; Khaled M Abdelhalim; Mohamed Bakr; Ahmed A El-Lilly; Mohamed A Elkoushy
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.861

9.  Cost-effectiveness of anti-retropulsive devices varies according to the locations of proximal ureteral stones: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Weisong Wu; Jiaqiao Zhang; Rixiati Yi; Xianmiu Li; Xiao Yu
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 2.264

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.