Literature DB >> 21375649

Adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to saline stress through laboratory evolution.

R Dhar1, R Sägesser, C Weikert, J Yuan, A Wagner.   

Abstract

Most laboratory evolution studies that characterize evolutionary adaptation genomically focus on genetically simple traits that can be altered by one or few mutations. Such traits are important, but they are few compared with complex, polygenic traits influenced by many genes. We know much less about complex traits, and about the changes that occur in the genome and in gene expression during their evolutionary adaptation. Salt stress tolerance is such a trait. It is especially attractive for evolutionary studies, because the physiological response to salt stress is well-characterized on the molecular and transcriptome level. This provides a unique opportunity to compare evolutionary adaptation and physiological adaptation to salt stress. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a good model system to study salt stress tolerance, because it contains several highly conserved pathways that mediate the salt stress response. We evolved three replicate lines of yeast under continuous salt (NaCl) stress for 300 generations. All three lines evolved faster growth rate in high salt conditions than their ancestor. In these lines, we studied gene expression changes through microarray analysis and genetic changes through next generation population sequencing. We found two principal kinds of gene expression changes, changes in basal expression (82 genes) and changes in regulation (62 genes). The genes that change their expression involve several well-known physiological stress-response genes, including CTT1, MSN4 and HLR1. Next generation sequencing revealed only one high-frequency single-nucleotide change, in the gene MOT2, that caused increased fitness when introduced into the ancestral strain. Analysis of DNA content per cell revealed ploidy increases in all the three lines. Our observations suggest that evolutionary adaptation of yeast to salt stress is associated with genome size increase and modest expression changes in several genes.
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2011 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21375649     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02249.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  48 in total

1.  Rapid selective sweep of pre-existing polymorphisms and slow fixation of new mutations in experimental evolution of Desulfovibrio vulgaris.

Authors:  Aifen Zhou; Kristina L Hillesland; Zhili He; Wendy Schackwitz; Qichao Tu; Grant M Zane; Qiao Ma; Yuanyuan Qu; David A Stahl; Judy D Wall; Terry C Hazen; Matthew W Fields; Adam P Arkin; Jizhong Zhou
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Physiological and transcriptomic analysis of a salt-resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant obtained by evolutionary engineering.

Authors:  Seyma Hande Tekarslan-Sahin; Ceren Alkim; Tugba Sezgin
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.363

Review 3.  The biology of habitat dominance; can microbes behave as weeds?

Authors:  Jonathan A Cray; Andrew N W Bell; Prashanth Bhaganna; Allen Y Mswaka; David J Timson; John E Hallsworth
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 5.813

4.  Isolation and molecular characterization of a novel WIN1/SHN1 ethylene-responsive transcription factor TdSHN1 from durum wheat (Triticum turgidum. L. subsp. durum).

Authors:  Rania Djemal; Habib Khoudi
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.356

Review 5.  Population perspectives on functional genomic variation in yeast.

Authors:  Daniel A Skelly; Paul M Magwene
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  The Ty1 LTR-retrotransposon of budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M Joan Curcio; Sheila Lutz; Pascale Lesage
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2015-04-01

Review 7.  The emergence of adaptive laboratory evolution as an efficient tool for biological discovery and industrial biotechnology.

Authors:  Troy E Sandberg; Michael J Salazar; Liam L Weng; Bernhard O Palsson; Adam M Feist
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 9.783

8.  Harnessing genetic diversity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for fermentation of xylose in hydrolysates of alkaline hydrogen peroxide-pretreated biomass.

Authors:  Trey K Sato; Tongjun Liu; Lucas S Parreiras; Daniel L Williams; Dana J Wohlbach; Benjamin D Bice; Irene M Ong; Rebecca J Breuer; Li Qin; Donald Busalacchi; Shweta Deshpande; Chris Daum; Audrey P Gasch; David B Hodge
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Shifting fitness landscapes in response to altered environments.

Authors:  Ryan T Hietpas; Claudia Bank; Jeffrey D Jensen; Daniel N A Bolon
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Evolutionary rescue and adaptation to abrupt environmental change depends upon the history of stress.

Authors:  Andrew Gonzalez; Graham Bell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.