BACKGROUND: South African guidelines for early detection and management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) recommend using the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) or Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations for calculating estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with the correction factor, 1.212, included for MDRD-eGFR in black patients. We compared eGFR against technetium-99m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid ((99m)Tc-DTPA) imaging. METHODS: Using clinical records, we retrospectively recorded demographic, clinical, and laboratory data as well as (99m)Tc-DTPA-measured GFR (mGFR) results obtained from routine visits. Data from 148 patients of African (n = 91) and Indian (n = 57) ancestry were analyzed. RESULTS: Median (IQR) mGFR was 38.5 (44) ml/min/1.73 m(2), with no statistical difference between African and Indian patients (P = 0. 573). In African patients with stage 3 CKD, MDRD-eGFR (unadjusted for black ethnicity) overestimated mGFR by 5.3% [2.0 (16.0) ml/min/1.73 m(2)] compared to CG-eGFR and MDRD-eGFR (corrected for black ethnicity) that overestimated mGFR by 17.7% [6.0 (15.0) ml/min/1.73 m(2)] and 17.1% [6.0 (17.5) ml/min/1.73 m(2)], respectively. In stage 1-2, CKD eGFR overestimated mGFR by 52.5, 38.0, and 19.3% for CG, MDRD (ethnicity-corrected), and MDRD (without correction), respectively. In Indian stage 3 CKD patients, MDRD-eGFR underestimated mGFR by 35.6% [-21.0 (6.5) ml/min/1.73 m(2)] and CG-eGFR by 4.4% [-2.0 (27.0) ml/min/1.73 m(2)], while in stage 1-2 CKD, CG-eGFR and MDRD-eGFR overestimated mGFR by 13.8 and 6.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: MDRD-eGFR calculated without the African-American correction factor improved GFR prediction in African CKD patients and using the MDRD correction factor of 1.0 in Indian patients as in Caucasians may be inappropriate.
BACKGROUND: South African guidelines for early detection and management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) recommend using the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) or Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations for calculating estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with the correction factor, 1.212, included for MDRD-eGFR in black patients. We compared eGFR against technetium-99m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid ((99m)Tc-DTPA) imaging. METHODS: Using clinical records, we retrospectively recorded demographic, clinical, and laboratory data as well as (99m)Tc-DTPA-measured GFR (mGFR) results obtained from routine visits. Data from 148 patients of African (n = 91) and Indian (n = 57) ancestry were analyzed. RESULTS: Median (IQR) mGFR was 38.5 (44) ml/min/1.73 m(2), with no statistical difference between African and Indian patients (P = 0. 573). In African patients with stage 3 CKD, MDRD-eGFR (unadjusted for black ethnicity) overestimated mGFR by 5.3% [2.0 (16.0) ml/min/1.73 m(2)] compared to CG-eGFR and MDRD-eGFR (corrected for black ethnicity) that overestimated mGFR by 17.7% [6.0 (15.0) ml/min/1.73 m(2)] and 17.1% [6.0 (17.5) ml/min/1.73 m(2)], respectively. In stage 1-2, CKD eGFR overestimated mGFR by 52.5, 38.0, and 19.3% for CG, MDRD (ethnicity-corrected), and MDRD (without correction), respectively. In Indian stage 3 CKD patients, MDRD-eGFR underestimated mGFR by 35.6% [-21.0 (6.5) ml/min/1.73 m(2)] and CG-eGFR by 4.4% [-2.0 (27.0) ml/min/1.73 m(2)], while in stage 1-2 CKD, CG-eGFR and MDRD-eGFR overestimated mGFR by 13.8 and 6.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: MDRD-eGFR calculated without the African-American correction factor improved GFR prediction in African CKD patients and using the MDRD correction factor of 1.0 in Indian patients as in Caucasians may be inappropriate.
Authors: Rossini Botev; Jean-Pierre Mallié; Cecilé Couchoud; Otto Schück; Jean-Pierre Fauvel; Jack F M Wetzels; Nelson Lee; Natale G De Santo; Massimo Cirillo Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2009-04-30 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Andrew S Levey; Lesley A Stevens; Christopher H Schmid; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Alejandro F Castro; Harold I Feldman; John W Kusek; Paul Eggers; Frederick Van Lente; Tom Greene; Josef Coresh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: John B Eastwood; Sally M Kerry; Jacob Plange-Rhule; Frank B Micah; Sampson Antwi; Frances G Boa; Debasish Banerjee; Lynsey Emmett; Michelle A Miller; Francesco P Cappuccio Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2010-01-25 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Tandi E Matsha; Yandiswa Y Yako; Megan A Rensburg; Mogamat S Hassan; Andre P Kengne; Rajiv T Erasmus Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2013-04-02 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Reneé De Waal; Karen Cohen; Matthew P Fox; Kathryn Stinson; Gary Maartens; Andrew Boulle; Ehimario U Igumbor; Mary-Ann Davies Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Udeme E Ekrikpo; Andre P Kengne; Aminu K Bello; Emmanuel E Effa; Jean Jacques Noubiap; Babatunde L Salako; Brian L Rayner; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Ikechi G Okpechi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Edmund J Lamb; Elizabeth A Brettell; Paul Cockwell; Neil Dalton; Jon J Deeks; Kevin Harris; Tracy Higgins; Philip A Kalra; Kamlesh Khunti; Fiona Loud; Ryan S Ottridge; Claire C Sharpe; Alice J Sitch; Paul E Stevens; Andrew J Sutton; Maarten W Taal Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2014-01-14 Impact factor: 2.388