Literature DB >> 21373274

Self-testing of vaginal pH to prevent preterm delivery: a controlled trial.

Eva-Maria Bitzer1, Andrea Schneider, Paul Wenzlaff, Udo B Hoyme, Elisabeth Siegmund-Schultze.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: From 2004 to 2006, in a model project carried out by four German health insurers, expectant mothers were offered self-testing of vaginal pH in order to prevent preterm delivery. They were given pH test gloves on request so that they could measure their vaginal pH twice a week from the 12(th) to the 32(nd) week of gestation. They were instructed to consult with a gynecologist after any positive result. All further diagnostic or therapeutic decisions were at the discretion of the treating gynecologist. We assessed the effectiveness of the screening intervention, using delivery before the 37th week of gestation as the primary endpoint.
METHODS: In this prospective, controlled trial, we collected data on deliveries from 2004 to 2006 that were covered by the four participating insurers in five German federal states. We compared the outcomes of pregnancy in women who did and did not request test gloves (intervention group, [IG], and control group, [CG]). The data were derived from claims data of the participating insurers, as well as from a nationwide quality assurance auditing program for obstetrics and perinatal care. Propensity score matching and multivariate adjustment were used to control for the expected self-selection bias.
RESULTS: The study sample comprised 149 082 deliveries. 13% of the expectant mothers requested test gloves, about half of them up to the 16(th) week of gestation. As expected, women with an elevated risk of preterm birth requested test gloves more often. Delivery before the 37(th) week of gestation was slightly more common in the intervention group than in the control group (IG 7.97%, CG 7.52%, relative risk 1.06, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.12). This result was of borderline statistical significance in the propensity score matched analysis, but it was not statistically significant in the multivariate model.
CONCLUSION: This trial did not demonstrate the efficacy of self-testing of vaginal pH for the prevention of preterm delivery (< 37 weeks of gestation).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21373274      PMCID: PMC3047717          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  8 in total

Review 1.  What's new in bacterial vaginosis and trichomoniasis?

Authors:  Jack D Sobel
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.982

2.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy and the risk of prematurity: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  C A Flynn; A L Helwig; L N Meurer
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  [Initial results of the Erfurt Prevention of Prematurity Campaign].

Authors:  U B Hoyme; A Grosch; V M Roemer; E Saling
Journal:  Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.685

5.  Prospective randomised controlled trial of an infection screening programme to reduce the rate of preterm delivery.

Authors:  Herbert Kiss; Ljubomir Petricevic; Peter Husslein
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-08-04

6.  Bacterial vaginosis as a risk factor for preterm delivery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Harald Leitich; Barbara Bodner-Adler; Mathias Brunbauer; Alexandra Kaider; Christian Egarter; Peter Husslein
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  Antenatal lower genital tract infection screening and treatment programs for preventing preterm delivery.

Authors:  Ussanee Swadpanich; Pisake Lumbiganon; Witoon Prasertcharoensook; Malinee Laopaiboon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-04-16

Review 8.  Evidence on the benefits and harms of screening and treating pregnant women who are asymptomatic for bacterial vaginosis: an update review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Peggy Nygren; Rongwei Fu; Michele Freeman; Christina Bougatsos; Mark Klebanoff; Jeanne-Marie Guise
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 25.391

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Correspondence (letter to the editor): methodological problems.

Authors:  Wolf Kirschner; Klaus Friese; Albrecht Scheffler
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Correspondence (letter to the editor): weaknesses in study design.

Authors:  Eiko E Petersen
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Correspondence (letter to the editor): serious shortcomings.

Authors:  Erich Saling; Jürgen Lüthje
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 4.  The prevention, diagnosis and treatment of premature labor.

Authors:  Ekkehard Schleußner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 5.594

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.