Herbert Kiss1, Ljubomir Petricevic, Peter Husslein. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Vienna Medical School, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. herbert.kiss@akh-wien.ac.at
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a screening strategy in pregnancy lowers the rate of preterm delivery in a general population of pregnant women. DESIGN: Multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Non-hospital based antenatal clinics. PARTICIPANTS: 4429 pregnant women presenting for their routine prenatal visits early in the second trimester were screened by Gram stain for asymptomatic vaginal infection. In the intervention group, the women's obstetricians received the test results and women received standard treatment and follow up for any detected infection. In the control group, the results of the vaginal smears were not revealed to the caregivers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome variable was preterm delivery at less than 37 weeks. Secondary outcome variables were preterm delivery at less than 37 weeks combined with different birth weight categories equal to or below 2500 g and the rate of late miscarriage. RESULTS: Outcome data were available for 2058 women in the intervention group and 2097 women in the control group. In the intervention group, the number of preterm births was significantly lower than in the control group (3.0% v 5.3%, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 3.6; P = 0.0001). Preterm births were also significantly reduced in lower weight categories at less than 37 weeks and <or= 2500 g. Eight late miscarriages occurred in the intervention group and 15 in the control group. CONCLUSION: Integrating a simple infection screening programme into routine antenatal care leads to a significant reduction in preterm births and reduces the rate of late miscarriage in a general population of pregnant women.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a screening strategy in pregnancy lowers the rate of preterm delivery in a general population of pregnant women. DESIGN: Multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Non-hospital based antenatal clinics. PARTICIPANTS: 4429 pregnant women presenting for their routine prenatal visits early in the second trimester were screened by Gram stain for asymptomatic vaginal infection. In the intervention group, the women's obstetricians received the test results and women received standard treatment and follow up for any detected infection. In the control group, the results of the vaginal smears were not revealed to the caregivers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome variable was preterm delivery at less than 37 weeks. Secondary outcome variables were preterm delivery at less than 37 weeks combined with different birth weight categories equal to or below 2500 g and the rate of late miscarriage. RESULTS: Outcome data were available for 2058 women in the intervention group and 2097 women in the control group. In the intervention group, the number of preterm births was significantly lower than in the control group (3.0% v 5.3%, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 3.6; P = 0.0001). Preterm births were also significantly reduced in lower weight categories at less than 37 weeks and <or= 2500 g. Eight late miscarriages occurred in the intervention group and 15 in the control group. CONCLUSION: Integrating a simple infection screening programme into routine antenatal care leads to a significant reduction in preterm births and reduces the rate of late miscarriage in a general population of pregnant women.
Authors: J C Carey; M A Klebanoff; J C Hauth; S L Hillier; E A Thom; J M Ernest; R P Heine; R P Nugent; M L Fischer; K J Leveno; R Wapner; M Varner Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-02-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: B M Mercer; R L Goldenberg; A H Moawad; P J Meis; J D Iams; A F Das; S N Caritis; M Miodovnik; M K Menard; G R Thurnau; M P Dombrowski; J M Roberts; D McNellis Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Harald Leitich; Mathias Brunbauer; Barbara Bodner-Adler; Alexandra Kaider; Christian Egarter; Peter Husslein Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Ronald F Lamont; Chia-Ling Nhan-Chang; Jack D Sobel; Kimberly Workowski; Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-04-02 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: C J Tann; H Mpairwe; L Morison; K Nassimu; P Hughes; M Omara; D Mabey; M Muwanga; H Grosskurth; A M Elliott Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Eva-Maria Bitzer; Andrea Schneider; Paul Wenzlaff; Udo B Hoyme; Elisabeth Siegmund-Schultze Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2011-02-11 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: J Reinhard; N Sänger; L C Hanker; S Peiffer; J Yuan; V A J Kempf; F Louwen Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 2.915