Literature DB >> 21372045

Embryo selection in IVF.

Sebastiaan Mastenbroek1, Fulco van der Veen, Abbas Aflatoonian, Bruce Shapiro, Patrick Bossuyt, Sjoerd Repping.   

Abstract

To optimize success rates of IVF, selection of the most viable embryo(s) for transfer has always been essential, as embryos that are cryopreserved are thought to have a reduced chance of implanting after thawing. Recent developments challenge this concept. Evidence is accumulating that all embryos can now be cryopreserved and transferred in subsequent cycles without impairing pregnancy rates or maybe even with an improvement in pregnancy rates. In such a scenario no selection method will ever lead to improved live birth rates, as, by definition, the live birth rate per stimulated IVF cycle can never be improved when all embryos are serially transferred. In fact, selection could then only lower the live birth rate after IVF. The only parameter that could possibly be improved by embryo selection would be time to pregnancy, if embryos with the highest implantation potential are transferred first.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21372045     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  15 in total

1.  Complex chromosomal rearrangement-a lesson learned from PGS.

Authors:  Tsvia Frumkin; Sagit Peleg; Veronica Gold; Adi Reches; Shiri Asaf; Foad Azem; Dalit Ben-Yosef; Mira Malcov
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Developmental capacity and pregnancy rate of tetrahedral- versus non-tetrahedral-shaped 4-cell stage human embryos.

Authors:  G Cauffman; G Verheyen; H Tournaye; H Van de Velde
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Kai Mee Wong; Madelon van Wely; Femke Mol; Sjoerd Repping; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-28

4.  (1)H NMR based profiling of spent culture media cannot predict success of implantation for day 3 human embryos.

Authors:  Paolo Rinaudo; Shehua Shen; Jia Hua; Su Qian; Uday Prabhu; Erwin Garcia; Marcelle Cedars; Dinesh Sukumaran; Thomas Szyperski; Chris Andrews
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  The why, the how and the when of PGS 2.0: current practices and expert opinions of fertility specialists, molecular biologists, and embryologists.

Authors:  Karen Sermon; Antonio Capalbo; Jacques Cohen; Edith Coonen; Martine De Rycke; Anick De Vos; Joy Delhanty; Francesco Fiorentino; Norbert Gleicher; Georg Griesinger; Jamie Grifo; Alan Handyside; Joyce Harper; Georgia Kokkali; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek; David Meldrum; Marcos Meseguer; Markus Montag; Santiago Munné; Laura Rienzi; Carmen Rubio; Katherine Scott; Richard Scott; Carlos Simon; Jason Swain; Nathan Treff; Filippo Ubaldi; Rita Vassena; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Willem Verpoest; Dagan Wells; Joep Geraedts
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.025

6.  Fertility technologies and how to optimize laboratory performance to support the shortening of time to birth of a healthy singleton: a Delphi consensus.

Authors:  Giovanni Coticchio; Barry Behr; Alison Campbell; Marcos Meseguer; Dean E Morbeck; Valerio Pisaturo; Carlos E Plancha; Denny Sakkas; Yanwen Xu; Thomas D'Hooghe; Evelyn Cottell; Kersti Lundin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Tjitske Zaat; Miriam Zagers; Femke Mol; Mariëtte Goddijn; Madelon van Wely; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-02-04

8.  Inter-laboratory agreement on embryo classification and clinical decision: Conventional morphological assessment vs. time lapse.

Authors:  Luis Martínez-Granados; María Serrano; Antonio González-Utor; Nereyda Ortíz; Vicente Badajoz; Enrique Olaya; Nicolás Prados; Montse Boada; Jose A Castilla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Non-invasive prediction of blastocyst implantation, ongoing pregnancy and live birth, by mass spectrometry lipid fingerprinting.

Authors:  Edson Borges; Daniela P A F Braga; Amanda Souza Setti; Daniela A Montanni; Elaine Cristina Cabral; Marcos N Eberlin; Edson G Lo Turco; Assumpto Iaconelli
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2016-12-01

10.  Economic evaluation of highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm-injection cycles in Sweden.

Authors:  Jaro Wex; Ahmed M Abou-Setta
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.