Literature DB >> 21371959

Endoscopically assisted reconstruction of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation using a synthetic ligament. Outcomes at 12 months.

G Cohen1, P Boyer, N Pujol, B Hamida Ferjani, P Massin, P Hardy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The treatment for acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation remains controversial because of the elevated level of complications and related morbidity. The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes, radiographic results, and the complications after arthroscopic stabilization of acute stages III or IV (Rockwood classification) acromioclavicular dislocations.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixteen patients (15 males and one female) found to have Rockwood stage III or IV AC joint dislocation were operated. All the patients were stabilized arthroscopically with a synthetic ligament placed between the clavicle and the coracoid. The application of the synthetic ligament reduced the dislocation and stabilized the AC joint, allowing healing of the coracoacromial ligament. Results were assessed clinically (Constant score) and radiographically before and a mean 12 months after the treatment.
RESULTS: Despite the excellent clinical results at the last follow-up both in terms of the Constant score (mean, 91 points; range, 60-100) and patient satisfaction, two patients required revision surgery while some had pain over the clavicular button. The X-rays showed three cases of partial loss of reduction due to distal migration of the flip button. DISCUSSION: Arthroscopically assisted treatment of acute AC joint dislocation is advantageous because it provides good clinical results and few complications. The rate of recurrence and the postoperative loss of reduction requires better definition of the indications and improvement of the surgical implants and technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. Prospective cohort study.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21371959     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  14 in total

1.  Why does minimally invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using a flip button repair technique fail? An analysis of risk factors and complications.

Authors:  Benedikt Schliemann; Steffen B Roßlenbroich; Kristian N Schneider; Christina Theisen; Wolf Petersen; Michael J Raschke; André Weimann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  [Therapy of acute acromioclavicular joint instability. Meta-analysis of arthroscopic/minimally invasive versus open procedures].

Authors:  T Helfen; G Siebenbürger; B Ockert; F Haasters
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Sports activity after anatomic acromioclavicular joint stabilisation with flip-button technique.

Authors:  Felix Porschke; Marc Schnetzke; Sara Aytac; Stefan Studier-Fischer; Paul Alfred Gruetzner; Thorsten Guehring
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Management of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the elbow trochlea in the adolescent population: A systematic review.

Authors:  Shahbaz S Malik; Damir Rasodivic; Abu Saeed; Robert W Jordan; Simon Maclean; Gregory I Bain
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2022-02-16

5.  Outcome of arthroscopic treatment for displaced lateral clavicle fractures using a double button device.

Authors:  Philippe Loriaut; Pierre-Emmanuel Moreau; Benjamin Dallaudière; Alexandre Pélissier; Hoang Duc Vu; Philippe Massin; Patrick Boyer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The prevalence of intraarticular associated lesions after acute acromioclavicular joint injuries is 20%. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Ruiz Ibán; Miguel Santiago Moreno Romero; Jorge Diaz Heredia; Raquel Ruiz Díaz; Alfonso Muriel; Jesus López-Alcalde
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Evaluation of the coracoclavicular reconstruction using LARS artificial ligament in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Nan Lu; Lei Zhu; Tianwen Ye; Aimin Chen; Xi Jiang; Zhiling Zhang; Qinghua Zhu; Qinghe Guo; Di Yang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Valentina Cardona; Valeria Vismara; Alessandra Scaini; Andrea G Salvi; Stefano Galli; Giacomo Marchi; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Medium- to long-term results of acromioclavicular joint stabilisation using the Ligament Augmentation Reconstruction System (LARS) ligament.

Authors:  Thomas Ja Hunter; Mohammed Abdus-Samee; Sivaraman Balasubramanian; Natalie Grocott; Damian McClelland
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-03-13

Review 10.  Complications following arthroscopic fixation of acromioclavicular separations: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Jarret M Woodmass; John G Esposito; Yohei Ono; Atiba A Nelson; Richard S Boorman; Gail M Thornton; Ian Ky Lo
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2015-04-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.