Literature DB >> 21371156

The genetical theory of kin selection.

A Gardner1, S A West, G Wild.   

Abstract

Natural selection operates both directly, via the impact of a trait upon the individual's own fitness, and indirectly, via the impact of the trait upon the fitness of the individual's genetically related social partners. These effects are often framed in terms of Hamilton's rule, rb - c > 0, which provides the central result of social-evolution theory. However, a number of studies have questioned the generality of Hamilton's rule, suggesting that it requires restrictive assumptions. Here, we use Fisher's genetical paradigm to demonstrate the generality of Hamilton's rule and to clarify links between different studies. We show that confusion has arisen owing to researchers misidentifying model parameters with the b and c terms in Hamilton's rule, and misidentifying measures of genotypic similarity or genealogical relationship with the coefficient of genetic relatedness, r. More generally, we emphasize the need to distinguish between general kin-selection theory that forms the foundations of social evolution, and streamlined kin-selection methodology that is used to solve specific problems.
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2011 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21371156     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02236.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  100 in total

Review 1.  Working together for the common good: cell-cell communication in bacteria.

Authors:  Ann M Stevens; Martin Schuster; Kendra P Rumbaugh
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Promiscuity and the evolution of cooperative breeding.

Authors:  Helen C Leggett; Claire El Mouden; Geoff Wild; Stuart West
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  The sociobiology of sex: inclusive fitness consequences of inter-sexual interactions.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  There is no fitness but fitness, and the lineage is its bearer.

Authors:  Erol Akçay; Jeremy Van Cleve
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Hamilton's rule and the causes of social evolution.

Authors:  Andrew F G Bourke
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Evolutionary dynamics of n-player games played by relatives.

Authors:  Hisashi Ohtsuki
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Interference Competition Among Household Strains of Pseudomonas.

Authors:  Michael T France; Susanna K Remold
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2015-08-16       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  Hamiltonian inclusive fitness: a fitter fitness concept.

Authors:  James T Costa
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Limitations of inclusive fitness.

Authors:  Benjamin Allen; Martin A Nowak; Edward O Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Monogamy and haplodiploidy act in synergy to promote the evolution of eusociality.

Authors:  Lutz Fromhage; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.