Literature DB >> 21369969

Olfactory working memory: effects of verbalization on the 2-back task.

Fredrik U Jönsson1, Per Møller, Mats J Olsson.   

Abstract

Working memory for odors, which has received almost no attention in the literature, was investigated in two experiments. We show that performance in a 2-back task with odor stimuli is well above chance. This is true not only for highly familiar odors, as has been shown by Dade, Zatorre, Evans, and Jones-Gotman, NeuroImage, 14, 650-660, (2001), but also for unfamiliar ones that are notoriously difficult to name. We can conclude that information about an olfactory stimulus can be retained in the short term and can continuously be updated for comparison with new olfactory probes along the lines of a functional odor working memory. However, the performance in the working memory task is highly dependent on participants' verbalization of the odor. In addition, results indicated that odor working memory performance is dependent on the ability to discriminate among the odor stimuli (Experiment 2). The results are discussed in relation to recent ideas of a separate olfactory working memory slave system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21369969     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0080-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  37 in total

1.  Selection of odorants for memory tests on the basis of familiarity, perceived complexity, pleasantness, similarity and identification.

Authors:  Claire Sulmont; Sylvie Issanchou; E P Köster
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Recognition with and without identification: dissociative effects of meaningful encoding.

Authors:  Anne M Cleary
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-07

3.  Single-probe serial position recall: evidence of modularity for olfactory, visual, and auditory short-term memory.

Authors:  Andrew J Johnson; Christopher Miles
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 4.  Olfactory memory: the long and short of it.

Authors:  T L White
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Age-related differences in episodic odour recognition: the role of access to specific odour names.

Authors:  M Larsson; L Bäckman
Journal:  Memory       Date:  1997-05

6.  Experience facilitates olfactory quality discrimination.

Authors:  M D Rabin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-12

7.  Differential sex effects in olfactory functioning: the role of verbal processing.

Authors:  Christina Oberg; Maria Larsson; Lars Bäckman
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.892

8.  Is the n-back task a valid neuropsychological measure for assessing working memory?

Authors:  K M Miller; C C Price; M S Okun; H Montijo; D Bowers
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 2.813

9.  Olfactory metacognition.

Authors:  Fredrik U Jönsson; Mats J Olsson
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  A specialized odor memory buffer in primary olfactory cortex.

Authors:  Christina Zelano; Jessica Montag; Rehan Khan; Noam Sobel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  12 in total

1.  The representation of conceptual knowledge: visual, auditory, and olfactory imagery compared with semantic processing.

Authors:  Massimiliano Palmiero; Rosalia Di Matteo; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-12-12

2.  Limitations in odour simulation may originate from differential sensory embodiment.

Authors:  Artin Arshamian; Patricia Manko; Asifa Majid
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The capacity and organization of gustatory working memory.

Authors:  Shivakumar Viswanathan; Kathrin Ohla; Shirley Xue Li Lim; Richard Höchenberger; Iryna Ruda; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Familiarity influences odor memory stability.

Authors:  Richard J Stevenson; Mehmet K Mahmut
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

5.  Nosewitness identification: effects of negative emotion.

Authors:  Laura Alho; Sandra C Soares; Jacqueline Ferreira; Marta Rocha; Carlos F Silva; Mats J Olsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Long-term memory for odors: influences of familiarity and identification across 64 days.

Authors:  Stina Cornell Kärnekull; Fredrik U Jönsson; Johan Willander; Sverker Sikström; Maria Larsson
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Nosewitness Identification: Effects of Lineup Size and Retention Interval.

Authors:  Laura Alho; Sandra C Soares; Liliana P Costa; Elisa Pinto; Jacqueline H T Ferreira; Kimmo Sorjonen; Carlos F Silva; Mats J Olsson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-30

8.  Odorant Normative Data for Use in Olfactory Memory Experiments: Dimension Selection and Analysis of Individual Differences.

Authors:  Andrew G Moss; Christopher Miles; Jane V Elsley; Andrew J Johnson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-24

Review 9.  The influences of age on olfaction: a review.

Authors:  Richard L Doty; Vidyulata Kamath
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-07

Review 10.  Human olfactory consciousness and cognition: its unusual features may not result from unusual functions but from limited neocortical processing resources.

Authors:  Richard J Stevenson; Tuki Attuquayefio
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.