Literature DB >> 12006371

Selection of odorants for memory tests on the basis of familiarity, perceived complexity, pleasantness, similarity and identification.

Claire Sulmont1, Sylvie Issanchou, E P Köster.   

Abstract

In a procedure for the selection of two equivalent sets of familiar and two equivalent sets of unfamiliar odours for use in odour memory studies, 24 naïve subjects were first asked to rate the familiarity, perceived complexity and pleasantness of 54 a priori unfamiliar odours and 57 a priori familiar odours and to identify the latter. After selection of the 40 most familiar and the 40 least familiar odours, the subjects sorted each of these two sets into groups of similar odours. Their results were analysed by multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis and each set was divided into two recognition sets that had the same degree of similarity between target and distractor odours and that had similar values of familiarity, pleasantness, perceived complexity (familiar and unfamiliar sets) and identifiability (familiar sets). Finally, recognition tasks were performed in order to check the equivalence in memory performance of both the two familiar and the two unfamiliar recognition sets.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12006371     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/27.4.307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  10 in total

1.  Olfactory working memory: effects of verbalization on the 2-back task.

Authors:  Fredrik U Jönsson; Per Møller; Mats J Olsson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-08

2.  Positive relationship between odor identification and affective responses of negatively valenced odors.

Authors:  Lenka Martinec Nováková; Dagmar Plotěná; S Craig Roberts; Jan Havlíček
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-11

3.  The mere exposure effect depends on an odor's initial pleasantness.

Authors:  Sylvain Delplanque; Géraldine Coppin; Laurène Bloesch; Isabelle Cayeux; David Sander
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-03

4.  Long-term memory for odors: influences of familiarity and identification across 64 days.

Authors:  Stina Cornell Kärnekull; Fredrik U Jönsson; Johan Willander; Sverker Sikström; Maria Larsson
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Odorant Normative Data for Use in Olfactory Memory Experiments: Dimension Selection and Analysis of Individual Differences.

Authors:  Andrew G Moss; Christopher Miles; Jane V Elsley; Andrew J Johnson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-24

6.  Apo E4 Alleles and Impaired Olfaction as Predictors of Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Magdalena M Misiak; MariaMananita S Hipolito; Habtom W Ressom; Thomas O Obisesan; Kebreten F Manaye; Evaristus A Nwulia
Journal:  Clin Exp Psychol       Date:  2017-10-19

7.  Verbally Induced Olfactory Illusions Are Not Caused by Visual Processing: Evidence From Early and Late Blindness.

Authors:  Stina Cornell Kärnekull; Billy Gerdfeldter; Maria Larsson; Artin Arshamian
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2021-05-22

8.  A "Misfit" Theory of Spontaneous Conscious Odor Perception (MITSCOP): reflections on the role and function of odor memory in everyday life.

Authors:  Egon P Köster; Per Møller; Jozina Mojet
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-11

Review 9.  A review on the neural bases of episodic odor memory: from laboratory-based to autobiographical approaches.

Authors:  Anne-Lise Saive; Jean-Pierre Royet; Jane Plailly
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  A network model of affective odor perception.

Authors:  Yingxuan Liu; Alexander Toet; Tanja Krone; Robin van Stokkum; Sophia Eijsman; Jan B F van Erp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.