Literature DB >> 29243740

Will oncotype DX DCIS testing guide therapy? A single-institution correlation of oncotype DX DCIS results with histopathologic findings and clinical management decisions.

Chieh-Yu Lin1, Kelly Mooney1, Winward Choy2, Soo-Ryum Yang1, Keegan Barry-Holson1, Kathleen Horst3, Irene Wapnir4, Kimberly Allison1.   

Abstract

Given the increased detection rates of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and the limited overall survival benefit from adjuvant breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery, there is interest in identifying subsets of patients who have low rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence such that they might safely forgo radiation. The Oncotype DCIS score is a reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR)-based assay that was validated to predict which DCIS cases are most likely to recur. Clinically, these results may be used to assist in selecting which patients with DCIS might safely forgo radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery; however, little is currently published on how this test is being used in practice. Our study examines traditional histopathologic features used in predicting DCIS risk with Oncotype DCIS results and how these results affect clinical decision-making at our academic institution. Histopathologic features and management decisions for 37 cases with Oncotype DCIS results over the past 4 years were collected. Necrosis, high nuclear grade, biopsy site change, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positivity <90% on immunohistochemistry, and Van Nuys Prognostic Index score of 8 or greater were significant predictors of an intermediate-high recurrence score on multivariate regression analysis (P<0.02). Low Oncotype DCIS scores and low nuclear grade were associated with lower rate of radiation therapy (P<0.008). There were seven cases (19%) with Oncotype DCIS results that we considered unexpected in relation to the histopathologic findings (ie, high nuclear grade with comedonecrosis and a low Oncotype score, or hormone receptor discrepancies). Overall, pathologic features correlate with Oncotype DCIS scores but unexpected results do occur, making individual recommendations sometimes challenging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29243740     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  23 in total

1.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: USC/Van Nuys Prognostic Index and the impact of margin status.

Authors:  Melvin J Silverstein; Claire Buchanan
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  Can features evaluated in the routine pathologic assessment of lymph node-negative estrogen receptor-positive stage I or II invasive breast cancer be used to predict the Oncotype DX recurrence score?

Authors:  Jena Auerbach; Mimi Kim; Susan Fineberg
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17.

Authors:  B Fisher; J Dignam; N Wolmark; E Mamounas; J Costantino; W Poller; E R Fisher; D L Wickerham; M Deutsch; R Margolese; N Dimitrov; M Kavanah
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  The impact of genomic testing on the recommendation for radiation therapy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: A prospective clinical utility assessment of the 12-gene DCIS score™ result.

Authors:  Michael Alvarado; Dennis L Carter; J Michael Guenther; James Hagans; Rachel Y Lei; Charles E Leonard; Jennifer Manders; Amy P Sing; Michael S Broder; Dasha Cherepanov; Eunice Chang; Marianne Eagan; Wendy Hsiao; Michael J Schultz
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Estimating the OncotypeDX score: validation of an inexpensive estimation tool.

Authors:  Anne A Eaton; Catherine E Pesce; James O Murphy; Michelle M Stempel; Sujata M Patil; Edi Brogi; Clifford A Hudis; Mahmoud El-Tamer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Algorithms for prediction of the Oncotype DX recurrence score using clinicopathologic data: a review and comparison using an independent dataset.

Authors:  Michael R Harowicz; Timothy J Robinson; Michaela A Dinan; Ashirbani Saha; Jeffrey R Marks; P Kelly Marcom; Maciej A Mazurowski
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Cost Effectiveness of the Oncotype DX DCIS Score for Guiding Treatment of Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Ann C Raldow; David Sher; Aileen B Chen; Abram Recht; Rinaa S Punglia
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Histopathologic variables predict Oncotype DX recurrence score.

Authors:  Melina B Flanagan; David J Dabbs; Adam M Brufsky; Sushil Beriwal; Rohit Bhargava
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Effect of tamoxifen and radiotherapy in women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in situ: long-term results from the UK/ANZ DCIS trial.

Authors:  Jack Cuzick; Ivana Sestak; Sarah E Pinder; Ian O Ellis; Sharon Forsyth; Nigel J Bundred; John F Forbes; Hugh Bishop; Ian S Fentiman; William D George
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Prediction of the Oncotype DX recurrence score: use of pathology-generated equations derived by linear regression analysis.

Authors:  Molly E Klein; David J Dabbs; Yongli Shuai; Adam M Brufsky; Rachel Jankowitz; Shannon L Puhalla; Rohit Bhargava
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 7.842

View more
  6 in total

1.  Do Eligibility Criteria for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) Active Surveillance Trials Identify Patients at Low Risk for Upgrade to Invasive Carcinoma?

Authors:  Tawakalitu O Oseni; Barbara L Smith; Constance D Lehman; Charmi A Vijapura; Niveditha Pinnamaneni; Manisha Bahl
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Biomarkers in a Precision Medicine Era: Current and Future Molecular-Based Testing.

Authors:  Kevin Shee; Kristen E Muller; Jonathan Marotti; Todd W Miller; Wendy A Wells; Gregory J Tsongalis
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Association of lifestyle and clinical characteristics with receipt of radiotherapy treatment among women diagnosed with DCIS in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study.

Authors:  Maeve Mullooly; Diana R Withrow; Rochelle E Curtis; Shaoqi Fan; Linda M Liao; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Amy Berrington de González; Gretchen L Gierach
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Analysis of 270 Consecutive Patients Treated in a 9-Year Period.

Authors:  Corrado Chiappa; Alice Bonetti; Giulio Jad Jaber; Valentina De Berardinis; Veronica Bianchi; Francesca Rovera
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Quantitative nuclear histomorphometric features are predictive of Oncotype DX risk categories in ductal carcinoma in situ: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Haojia Li; Jon Whitney; Kaustav Bera; Hannah Gilmore; Mangesh A Thorat; Sunil Badve; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  Impact of Oncotype DX testing on ER+ breast cancer treatment and survival in the first decade of use.

Authors:  Evelien Schaafsma; Baoyi Zhang; Merit Schaafsma; Chun-Yip Tong; Lanjing Zhang; Chao Cheng
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 6.466

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.