| Literature DB >> 21368490 |
Hirotaka Kitamura1, Tamon Miyanaga, Hisatou Shin, Manami Fujita, Manami Miyazaki, Daisuke Yagi, Homare Ito, Yoshihide Asaumi, Yasumitsu Hirano, Yuichi Hayashida, Kazunari Maeda, Koji Ota, Hiroyuki Hayashi, Kenji Douden, Masakazu Hattori, Yasuo Hashidume, Tsugihisa Sasaki.
Abstract
We report the frequency of lacrimal passage disorder and the outcomes of treatment. This retrospective study was performed on 55 cases that were treated with S-1 for at least 1 month. We asked patients about ocular symptoms. An ophthalmic surgeon examined all patients and diagnosed lacrimal passage disorder in 6 of 55 patients (12. 5%). The mean dose of S- 1 was 10, 300 mg, and the average period to onset of lacrimal passage disorder was 5. 7 months. The causes of epiphora included occlusion/stenosis of lacrimal canaliculus, occlusion of lacrimal puncta and stenosis of nasolacrimal duct. Lacrimal surgery was performed in all 6 patients and epiphora improved. Lacrimal passage disorder may result from systemic treatment of patients with S-1. Symptoms of lacrimal passage disorder improved with early detection and treatment by insertion of a silicone tube.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21368490
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ISSN: 0385-0684