Literature DB >> 21368168

Subjective and objective learning effects dissociate in space and in time.

Caspar M Schwiedrzik1, Wolf Singer, Lucia Melloni.   

Abstract

Perceptual learning not only improves sensitivity, but it also changes our subjective experience. However, the question of how these two learning effects relate is largely unexplored. Here we investigate how subjects learn to see initially indiscriminable metacontrast-masked shapes. We find that sensitivity and subjective awareness increase with training. However, sensitivity and subjective awareness dissociate in space: Learning effects on performance are lost when the task is performed at an untrained location in another quadrant, whereas learning effects on subjective awareness are maintained. This finding indicates that improvements in shape sensitivity involve visual areas up to V4, whereas changes in subjective awareness involve other brain regions. Furthermore, subjective awareness dissociates from sensitivity in time: In an early phase of perceptual learning, subjects perform above chance on trials that they rate as subjectively invisible. Later, this phenomenon disappears. Subjective awareness is thus neither necessary nor sufficient for achieving above-chance objective performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21368168      PMCID: PMC3060237          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1009147108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  36 in total

1.  Suppression on neuronal responses by a metacontrast masking stimulus in monkey V4.

Authors:  H Kondo; H Komatsu
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.304

2.  Signal but not noise changes with perceptual learning.

Authors:  J Gold; P J Bennett; A B Sekuler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-11-11       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Effects of visual experience on the representation of objects in the prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  G Rainer; E K Miller
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Measuring any conscious content versus measuring the relevant conscious content: comment on Sandberg et al.

Authors:  Zoltan Dienes; Anil K Seth
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2010-04-18

Review 5.  A higher order Bayesian decision theory of consciousness.

Authors:  Hakwan C Lau
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.453

6.  Causal role of prefrontal cortex in the threshold for access to consciousness.

Authors:  A Del Cul; S Dehaene; P Reyes; E Bravo; A Slachevsky
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Rapid recurrent processing gates awareness in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  C N Boehler; M A Schoenfeld; H-J Heinze; J-M Hopf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Sensitivity and perceptual awareness increase with practice in metacontrast masking.

Authors:  Caspar M Schwiedrzik; Wolf Singer; Lucia Melloni
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Reproducibility distinguishes conscious from nonconscious neural representations.

Authors:  Aaron Schurger; Francisco Pereira; Anne Treisman; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Consciousness: reading the neural signature.

Authors:  Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Theoretical Models of Consciousness: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Davide Sattin; Francesca Giulia Magnani; Laura Bartesaghi; Milena Caputo; Andrea Veronica Fittipaldo; Martina Cacciatore; Mario Picozzi; Matilde Leonardi
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-04-24

2.  Asymmetric transfer of sound localization learning between indistinguishable interaural cues.

Authors:  Anders Sand; Mats E Nilsson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Enhanced conscious processing and blindsight-like detection of fear-conditioned stimuli under continuous flash suppression.

Authors:  Joana B Vieira; Sophia Wen; Lindsay D Oliver; Derek G V Mitchell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Kinds of access: different methods for report reveal different kinds of metacognitive access.

Authors:  Morten Overgaard; Kristian Sandberg
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Examining the robustness of the relationship between metacognitive efficiency and metacognitive bias.

Authors:  Kai Xue; Medha Shekhar; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2021-09-01

6.  EEG-microstate dependent emergence of perceptual awareness.

Authors:  Juliane Britz; Laura Díaz Hernàndez; Tony Ro; Christoph M Michel
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 7.  Neural processing of visual information under interocular suppression: a critical review.

Authors:  Philipp Sterzer; Timo Stein; Karin Ludwig; Marcus Rothkirch; Guido Hesselmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-19

Review 8.  Toward a computational theory of conscious processing.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Lucie Charles; Jean-Rémi King; Sébastien Marti
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2013-12-29       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 9.  Knowing Ourselves Together: The Cultural Origins of Metacognition.

Authors:  Cecilia Heyes; Dan Bang; Nicholas Shea; Christopher D Frith; Stephen M Fleming
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 10.  How to measure metacognition.

Authors:  Stephen M Fleming; Hakwan C Lau
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.