Literature DB >> 34481178

Examining the robustness of the relationship between metacognitive efficiency and metacognitive bias.

Kai Xue1, Medha Shekhar2, Dobromir Rahnev2.   

Abstract

We recently found a positive relationship between estimates of metacognitive efficiency and metacognitive bias. However, this relationship was only examined on a within-subject level and required binarizing the confidence scale, a technique that introduces methodological difficulties. Here we examined the robustness of the positive relationship between estimates of metacognitive efficiency and metacognitive bias by conducting two different types of analyses. First, we developed a new within-subject analysis technique where the original n-point confidence scale is transformed into two different (n-1)-point scales in a way that mimics a naturalistic change in confidence. Second, we examined the across-subject correlation between metacognitive efficiency and metacognitive bias. Importantly, for both types of analyses, we not only established the direction of the effect but also computed effect sizes. We applied both techniques to the data from three tasks from the Confidence Database (N > 400 in each). We found that both approaches revealed a small to medium positive relationship between metacognitive efficiency and metacognitive bias. These results demonstrate that the positive relationship between metacognitive efficiency and metacognitive bias is robust across several analysis techniques and datasets, and have important implications for future research. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Confidence; Metacognition; Metacognitive noise; Perceptual decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34481178      PMCID: PMC8560567          DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2021.103196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  26 in total

1.  Mechanisms of perceptual learning.

Authors:  B A Dosher; Z L Lu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Spatial attention excludes external noise at the target location.

Authors:  Zhong-Lin Lu; Luis A Lesmes; Barbara A Dosher
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Sensory noise increases metacognitive efficiency.

Authors:  Ji Won Bang; Medha Shekhar; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-11-01

Review 4.  Sources of Metacognitive Inefficiency.

Authors:  Medha Shekhar; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Confidence Is the Bridge between Multi-stage Decisions.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Ariel Zylberberg; Roozbeh Kiani; Michael N Shadlen; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Relating introspective accuracy to individual differences in brain structure.

Authors:  Stephen M Fleming; Rimona S Weil; Zoltan Nagy; Raymond J Dolan; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Mesolimbic confidence signals guide perceptual learning in the absence of external feedback.

Authors:  Matthias Guggenmos; Gregor Wilbertz; Martin N Hebart; Philipp Sterzer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  The signal processing architecture underlying subjective reports of sensory awareness.

Authors:  Brian Maniscalco; Hakwan Lau
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2016-03-09

9.  Metacognitive ability predicts learning cue-stimulus associations in the absence of external feedback.

Authors:  Marine Hainguerlot; Jean-Christophe Vergnaud; Vincent de Gardelle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Psychiatric Symptom Dimensions Are Associated With Dissociable Shifts in Metacognition but Not Task Performance.

Authors:  Marion Rouault; Tricia Seow; Claire M Gillan; Stephen M Fleming
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 13.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.