Literature DB >> 21368083

Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty.

Harpal S Khanuja1, Jeffrey J Vakil, Maria S Goddard, Michael A Mont.   

Abstract

A number of cementless femoral stems are associated with excellent long-term survivorship. Cementless designs differ from one another in terms of geometry and the means of obtaining initial fixation. Strict classification of stem designs is important in order to compare results among series. Loosening and thigh pain are less prevalent with modern stem designs. Stress-shielding is present in most cases, even with newer stem designs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21368083     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  85 in total

1.  The effect of femoral neck osteotomy on femoral component position of a primary cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dimitris Dimitriou; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Outcome of short versus conventional stem for total hip arthroplasty in the femur with a high cortical index: a five year follow-up prospective multicentre comparative study.

Authors:  Francesco Pogliacomi; Paolo Schiavi; Guido Grappiolo; Francesco Ceccarelli; Enrico Vaienti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  CORR Insights®: Is Cemented or Cementless Femoral Stem Fixation More Durable in Patients Older Than 75 Years of Age? A Comparison of the Best-performing Stems.

Authors:  Nikolaos V Bardakos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Densitometric evaluation of periprosthetic bone remodeling.

Authors:  Paolo Domenico Parchi; Valentina Cervi; Nicola Piolanti; Gianluca Ciapini; Lorenzo Andreani; Iacopo Castellini; Andrea Poggetti; Michele Lisanti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2014-09

5.  Dual offset metaphyseal-filling stems in primary total hip arthroplasty in dysplastic hips after a minimum follow-up of ten years.

Authors:  Goksel Dikmen; Vahit Emre Ozden; Burak Beksac; Ismail Remzi Tozun
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Assessment and management of chronic pain in patients with stable total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tim Classen; Daniela Zaps; Stefan Landgraeber; Xinning Li; Marcus Jäger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Femoral cortical thickness influences the pattern of proximal femoral periprosthetic fractures with a cemented stem.

Authors:  Jarrad Stevens; Nicholas Clement; Michael Nasserallah; Michael Millar; Sam Joseph
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-08

8.  Biological fixation of total hip arthroplasty: Facts and factors.

Authors:  Raju Karuppal
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-06-15

9.  Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?

Authors:  Kirill Gromov; Alma B Pedersen; Søren Overgaard; Peter Gebuhr; Henrik Malchau; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Long-term (20- to 25-year) results of an uncemented tapered titanium femoral component and factors affecting survivorship.

Authors:  Marcus R Streit; Moritz M Innmann; Christian Merle; Thomas Bruckner; Peter R Aldinger; Tobias Gotterbarm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.