Literature DB >> 21367941

Matching and correlation computations in stereoscopic depth perception.

Takahiro Doi1, Seiji Tanabe, Ichiro Fujita.   

Abstract

A fundamental task of the visual system is to infer depth by using binocular disparity. To encode binocular disparity, the visual cortex performs two distinct computations: one detects matched patterns in paired images (matching computation); the other constructs the cross-correlation between the images (correlation computation). How the two computations are used in stereoscopic perception is unclear. We dissociated their contributions in near/far discrimination by varying the magnitude of the disparity across separate sessions. For small disparity (0.03°), subjects performed at chance level to a binocularly opposite-contrast (anti-correlated) random-dot stereogram (RDS) but improved their performance with the proportion of contrast-matched (correlated) dots. For large disparity (0.48°), the direction of perceived depth reversed with an anti-correlated RDS relative to that for a correlated one. Neither reversed nor normal depth was perceived when anti-correlation was applied to half of the dots. We explain the decision process as a weighted average of the two computations, with the relative weight of the correlation computation increasing with the disparity magnitude. We conclude that matching computation dominates fine depth perception, while both computations contribute to coarser depth perception. Thus, stereoscopic depth perception recruits different computations depending on the disparity magnitude.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21367941     DOI: 10.1167/11.3.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  17 in total

1.  Pooled, but not single-neuron, responses in macaque V4 represent a solution to the stereo correspondence problem.

Authors:  Mohammad Abdolrahmani ا; Takahiro Doi; Hiroshi M Shiozaki; Ichiro Fujita
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The psychophysics of stereopsis can be explained without invoking independent ON and OFF channels.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  Weighted parallel contributions of binocular correlation and match signals to conscious perception of depth.

Authors:  Ichiro Fujita; Takahiro Doi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Disparity processing in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Sid Henriksen; Seiji Tanabe; Bruce Cumming
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Interocular correlation sensitivity and its relationship with stereopsis.

Authors:  Alexandre Reynaud; Robert F Hess
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Binocular cross-correlation analyses of the effects of high-order aberrations on the stereoacuity of eyes with keratoconus.

Authors:  Sangeetha Metlapally; Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Austin Roorda; Vinay Kumar Nilagiri; Tiffanie T Yu; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  Toward a unified theory of visual area V4.

Authors:  Anna W Roe; Leonardo Chelazzi; Charles E Connor; Bevil R Conway; Ichiro Fujita; Jack L Gallant; Haidong Lu; Wim Vanduffel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Neurons in Striate Cortex Signal Disparity in Half-Matched Random-Dot Stereograms.

Authors:  Sid Henriksen; Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Specialized contributions of mid-tier stages of dorsal and ventral pathways to stereoscopic processing in macaque.

Authors:  Toshihide W Yoshioka; Takahiro Doi; Mohammad Abdolrahmani; Ichiro Fujita
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Depth perception not found in human observers for static or dynamic anti-correlated random dot stereograms.

Authors:  Paul B Hibbard; Kenneth C Scott-Brown; Emma C Haigh; Melanie Adrain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.