Literature DB >> 21367784

Frequency-dependent variation in mimetic fidelity in an intraspecific mimicry system.

Arne Iserbyt1, Jessica Bots, Stefan Van Dongen, Janice J Ting, Hans Van Gossum, Thomas N Sherratt.   

Abstract

Contemporary theory predicts that the degree of mimetic similarity of mimics towards their model should increase as the mimic/model ratio increases. Thus, when the mimic/model ratio is high, then the mimic has to resemble the model very closely to still gain protection from the signal receiver. To date, empirical evidence of this effect is limited to a single example where mimicry occurs between species. Here, for the first time, we test whether mimetic fidelity varies with mimic/model ratios in an intraspecific mimicry system, in which signal receivers are the same species as the mimics and models. To this end, we studied a polymorphic damselfly with a single male phenotype and two female morphs, in which one morph resembles the male phenotype while the other does not. Phenotypic similarity of males to both female morphs was quantified using morphometric data for multiple populations with varying mimic/model ratios repeated over a 3 year period. Our results demonstrate that male-like females were overall closer in size to males than the other female morph. Furthermore, the extent of morphological similarity between male-like females and males, measured as Mahalanobis distances, was frequency-dependent in the direction predicted. Hence, this study provides direct quantitative support for the prediction that the mimetic similarity of mimics to their models increases as the mimic/model ratio increases. We suggest that the phenomenon may be widespread in a range of mimicry systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21367784      PMCID: PMC3158940          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  10 in total

1.  The evolution of inaccurate mimics.

Authors:  Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Negative frequency-dependent selection in female color polymorphism of a damselfly.

Authors:  Yuma Takahashi; Jin Yoshimura; Satoru Morita; Mamoru Watanabe
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Nonrandom mating preserves intrasexual polymorphism and stops population differentiation in sexual conflict.

Authors:  Roger Hardling; Johannes Bergsten
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-01-09       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Spatial variation in colour morph, spotting and allozyme frequencies in the candy-stripe spider, Enoplognatha ovata (Theridiidae) on two Swedish archipelagos.

Authors:  G S Oxford; B Gunnarsson
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2006 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Female polymorphism, frequency dependence, and rapid evolutionary dynamics in natural populations.

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Jessica Abbott; Roger Hardling
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Density-dependent male mating harassment, female resistance, and male mimicry.

Authors:  Thomas P Gosden; Erik I Svensson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  The generation and maintenance of genetic variation by frequency-dependent selection: constructing polymorphisms under the pairwise interaction model.

Authors:  Meredith V Trotter; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-09-14       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Mimicry on the edge: why do mimics vary in resemblance to their model in different parts of their geographical range?

Authors:  George R Harper; David W Pfennig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Coevolutionary chase in two-species systems with applications to mimicry.

Authors:  S Gavrilets; A Hastings
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1998-04-21       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 10.  Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.

Authors:  M D Jennions; M Petrie
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1997-05
  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  A comparative analysis of the evolution of imperfect mimicry.

Authors:  Heather D Penney; Christopher Hassall; Jeffrey H Skevington; Kevin R Abbott; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Maintenance of polymorphic females: do parasites play a role?

Authors:  R A Sánchez-Guillén; S M J Martínez-Zamilpa; J G Jiménez-Cortés; M R L Forbes; A Córdoba-Aguilar
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Frequency dependence shapes the adaptive landscape of imperfect Batesian mimicry.

Authors:  Susan D Finkbeiner; Patricio A Salazar; Sofía Nogales; Cassidi E Rush; Adriana D Briscoe; Ryan I Hill; Marcus R Kronforst; Keith R Willmott; Sean P Mullen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Biogeographical survey identifies consistent alternative physiological optima and a minor role for environmental drivers in maintaining a polymorphism.

Authors:  Arne Iserbyt; Hans Van Gossum; Robby Stoks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Negative frequency-dependent selection or alternative reproductive tactics: maintenance of female polymorphism in natural populations.

Authors:  Arne Iserbyt; Jessica Bots; Hans Van Gossum; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  From cues to signals: evolution of interspecific communication via aposematism and mimicry in a predator-prey system.

Authors:  Kenna D S Lehmann; Brian W Goldman; Ian Dworkin; David M Bryson; Aaron P Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Ecological and evolutionary processes drive the origin and maintenance of imperfect mimicry.

Authors:  Joseph S Wilson; Joshua P Jahner; Kevin A Williams; Matthew L Forister
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The sicker sex: understanding male biases in parasitic infection, resource allocation and fitness.

Authors:  Alex Córdoba-Aguilar; Roberto Munguía-Steyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.