Paul P Thompson1, Regis P Kowalski. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a molecular technique for the diagnosis of ocular infectious disease. In this large patient sample and multiyear study, the impact of PCR for detecting infectious agents from ocular samples was reviewed in comparison with nonmolecular diagnostic techniques. DESIGN: A retrospective laboratory review of PCR testing. PARTICIPANTS: Three thousand fifty-six patient samples with a differential of ocular infection. METHODS: The daily laboratory logs for diagnostic testing were reviewed for PCR, cell culture isolation, shell vial isolation, and Acanthamoeba isolation from January 1997 through May 2010 for herpes simplex virus (HSV), adenovirus, varicella zoster virus (VZV), Chlamydia trachomatis, Acanthamoeba, and infrequent pathogens of intraocular inflammation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of the positive presence of ocular infectious agents. RESULTS: Polymerase chain reaction results were positive more often than culture results for HSV (P = 0.0001), VZV (P = 0.00001), C. trachomatis (P = 0.00005), and Acanthamoeba (P = 0.04). For adenovirus, cell culture isolation results were positive more often than PCR results (P = 0.001). Polymerase chain reaction was the primary diagnostic test for detecting cytomegalovirus and Toxoplasma. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated the importance of PCR as a routine diagnostic test for detecting both common and infrequent ocular pathogens. Cell culture isolation is still a definitive test for adenovirus and a confirmatory test for HSV and Acanthamoeba.
PURPOSE: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a molecular technique for the diagnosis of ocular infectious disease. In this large patient sample and multiyear study, the impact of PCR for detecting infectious agents from ocular samples was reviewed in comparison with nonmolecular diagnostic techniques. DESIGN: A retrospective laboratory review of PCR testing. PARTICIPANTS: Three thousand fifty-six patient samples with a differential of ocular infection. METHODS: The daily laboratory logs for diagnostic testing were reviewed for PCR, cell culture isolation, shell vial isolation, and Acanthamoeba isolation from January 1997 through May 2010 for herpes simplex virus (HSV), adenovirus, varicella zoster virus (VZV), Chlamydia trachomatis, Acanthamoeba, and infrequent pathogens of intraocular inflammation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of the positive presence of ocular infectious agents. RESULTS: Polymerase chain reaction results were positive more often than culture results for HSV (P = 0.0001), VZV (P = 0.00001), C. trachomatis (P = 0.00005), and Acanthamoeba (P = 0.04). For adenovirus, cell culture isolation results were positive more often than PCR results (P = 0.001). Polymerase chain reaction was the primary diagnostic test for detecting cytomegalovirus and Toxoplasma. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated the importance of PCR as a routine diagnostic test for detecting both common and infrequent ocular pathogens. Cell culture isolation is still a definitive test for adenovirus and a confirmatory test for HSV and Acanthamoeba.
Authors: Maria Dullaert-de Boer; Onno W Akkerman; Marloes Vermeer; Dorine L J Hess; Huib A M Kerstjens; Richard M Anthony; Tjip S van der Werf; Dick van Soolingen; Adri G M van der Zanden Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 3.240