Literature DB >> 26987564

Sensitivity of the Standard Chlamydia trachomatis Culture Method Is Improved After One Additional In Vitro Passage.

Lili Shao1, Yuanli Guo1, Yong Jiang1, Yuanjun Liu1, Mei Wang1, Cong You1, Quanzhong Liu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis causes the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) worldwide. Although highly sensitive nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are used to routinely diagnose chlamydial infection, C. trachomatis isolation by cell culture is still preferred for legal cases and epidemiological studies because of its high specificity; however, the sensitivity of traditional two-passage diagnostic cultures is significantly lower than that of NAATs. Therefore, we sought to analyze if additional in vitro passaging of clinical samples would improve detection sensitivity of C. trachomatis.
METHODS: Clinical swabs (n = 428) were collected from Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, grown in McCoy cells for up to five passages, and analyzed for the presence of inclusions by iodine staining. Results were confirmed by routine PCR-based methods.
RESULTS: Viable C. trachomatis organisms were detected in 91 (21.26%) swabs with the traditional two-passage protocol, which increased to 145 (33.88%) and 149 (34.81%) following three and four passages, respectively. Thus, the standard protocol yielded a false-negative rate of nearly 39%. Subsequent PCR-based diagnostics revealed a concordance rate of 80.98% between these two methods without any false negatives.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study support the use of a three-passage Chlamydia culture procedure to increase the detection sensitivity of this method.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diagnostic tests; early diagnosis, nucleic acid amplification test; sensitivity; sexually transmitted diseases; specificity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26987564      PMCID: PMC6807024          DOI: 10.1002/jcla.21924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal        ISSN: 0887-8013            Impact factor:   2.352


  15 in total

1.  Chlamydia trachomatis persistence in vitro: an overview.

Authors:  Priscilla B Wyrick
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Chlamydia trachomatis secretion of an immunodominant hypothetical protein (CT795) into host cell cytoplasm.

Authors:  Manli Qi; Lei Lei; Siqi Gong; Quanzhong Liu; Matthew P DeLisa; Guangming Zhong
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Evaluation of one-sample testing of self-obtained vaginal swabs and first catch urine samples separately and in combination for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by two amplified DNA assays in women visiting a sexually transmitted disease clinic.

Authors:  Laura van Dommelen; Nicole Dukers-Muijrers; Frank H van Tiel; Elfi E H G Brouwers; Christian J P A Hoebe
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Efficacy of cytology for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant women.

Authors:  Maria da Conceição de Mesquita Cornetta; Ana Katherine da Silveira Gonçalves; Anna Maria Bertini
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.949

5.  The laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  Max A Chernesky
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 6.  [Microbiological diagnosis of infections due to Chlamydia spp. and related species].

Authors:  Mario Rodríguez-Domínguez; Sara Sanbonmatsu; Jesús Salinas; Roberto Alonso; José Gutiérrez; Juan Carlos Galán
Journal:  Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 7.  Laboratory diagnosis of human chlamydial infections.

Authors:  R C Barnes
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection among infertile women in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Remah M Kamel
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2013-06-06

9.  Classical and Molecular Methods for Evaluation of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection in Women with Tubal Factor Infertility.

Authors:  Bahareh Hajikhani; Tayebeh Motallebi; Jamileh Norouzi; Abbas Bahador; Rezvan Bagheri; Soheila Asgari; Leili Chamani-Tabriz
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2013-01

Review 10.  Genital Chlamydia trachomatis: an update.

Authors:  Meenakshi Malhotra; Seema Sood; Anjan Mukherjee; Sumathi Muralidhar; Manju Bala
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.375

View more
  2 in total

1.  In-cell western assay as a high-throughput approach for Chlamydia trachomatis quantification and susceptibility testing to antimicrobials.

Authors:  Simone Filardo; Marisa Di Pietro; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Martina Manera; Fabiana Diaco; Rosa Sessa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Chlamydia trachomatis as a Current Health Problem: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Rafaela Rodrigues; Carlos Sousa; Nuno Vale
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.