Literature DB >> 21367353

Why do some patients with schizophrenia want to be engaged in medical decision making and others do not?

Johannes Hamann1, Rosmarie Mendel, Sarah Reiter, Rudolf Cohen, Markus Bühner, Matthias Schebitz, Stefan Diplich, Werner Kissling, Achim Berthele.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Treatment guidelines for schizophrenia recommend that medical decisions should be shared between patients with schizophrenia and their physicians. Our goal was to determine why some patients want to participate in medical decision making and others do not.
METHOD: To identify determinants of participation preferences in schizophrenia patients (ICD-10 criteria) and in a nonpsychiatric comparison group (multiple sclerosis), we undertook a cross-sectional survey in 4 psychiatric and neurologic hospitals in Germany. Inpatients suffering from schizophrenia or multiple sclerosis (but not both) were consecutively recruited (2007-2008), and 203 patients participated in the study (101 with schizophrenia and 102 with multiple sclerosis). Predictors for patients' participation preferences were identified using a structural equation model.
RESULTS: Patients' reports about their participation preferences in medical decisions can be predicted to a considerable extent (52% of the variance). For patients with schizophrenia, poor treatment satisfaction (P < .001), negative attitudes toward medication (P < .05), better perceived decision making skills (P < .001), and higher education (P < .01) were related to higher participation preferences. In the comparison group, drug attitudes (P < .05) and education (P < .05) were also shown to be related with participation preferences.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with schizophrenia who want to participate in decision making are often dissatisfied with care or are skeptical toward medication. Patients who judge their decisional capacity as poor or who are poorly educated prefer not to participate in decision making. Future implementation strategies for shared decision making must address how dissatisfied patients can be included in decision making and how patients who currently do not want to share decisions can be enabled, empowered, and motivated for shared decision making. © Copyright 2011 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21367353     DOI: 10.4088/JCP.10m06119yel

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  12 in total

1.  Information and Decision-Making Needs Among People with Anxiety Disorders: Results of an Online Survey.

Authors:  Sarah Liebherz; Martin Härter; Jörg Dirmaier; Lisa Tlach
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Consumer satisfaction with psychiatric services: The role of shared decision making and the therapeutic relationship.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Klingaman; Deborah R Medoff; Stephanie G Park; Clayton H Brown; Lijuan Fang; Lisa B Dixon; Samantha M Hack; Stephanie L Tapscott; Mary Brighid Walsh; Julie A Kreyenbuhl
Journal:  Psychiatr Rehabil J       Date:  2015-02-09

3.  Core domains of shared decision-making during psychiatric visits: scientific and preference-based discussions.

Authors:  Sadaaki Fukui; Marianne S Matthias; Michelle P Salyers
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2015-01

4.  Supporting shared decision making beyond consumer-prescriber interactions: Initial development of the CommonGround fidelity scale.

Authors:  Sadaaki Fukui; Michelle P Salyers; Charlie Rapp; Rick Goscha; Leslie Young; Ally Mabry
Journal:  Am J Psychiatr Rehabil       Date:  2016-08-19

5.  Predictors of shared decision making and level of agreement between consumers and providers in psychiatric care.

Authors:  Sadaaki Fukui; Michelle P Salyers; Marianne S Matthias; Linda Collins; John Thompson; Melinda Coffman; William C Torrey
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2013-01-09

Review 6.  [Shared decision-making in acute psychiatric medicine : Contraindication or a challenge?]

Authors:  S Heres; J Hamann
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.214

7.  Factor structure of the autonomy preference index in people with severe mental illness.

Authors:  Kelsey A Bonfils; Erin L Adams; Kim T Mueser; Jennifer L Wright-Berryman; Michelle P Salyers
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  Treatment engagement of individuals experiencing mental illness: review and update.

Authors:  Lisa B Dixon; Yael Holoshitz; Ilana Nossel
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 49.548

9.  Factors influencing patients' preferences and perceived involvement in shared decision-making in mental health care.

Authors:  Johanne Eliacin; Michelle P Salyers; Marina Kukla; Marianne S Matthias
Journal:  J Ment Health       Date:  2014-10-03

10.  Information and decision-making needs among people with affective disorders - results of an online survey.

Authors:  Sarah Liebherz; Lisa Tlach; Martin Härter; Jörg Dirmaier
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.