Small molecules, namely coactivator binding inhibitors (CBIs), that block estrogen signaling by directly inhibiting the interaction of the estrogen receptor (ER) with coactivator proteins act in a fundamentally different way to traditional antagonists, which displace the endogenous ligand estradiol. To complement our prior efforts at CBI discovery by de novo design, we used high-throughput screening (HTS) to identify CBIs of novel structure and subsequently investigated two HTS hits by analogue synthesis, finding many compounds with low micromolar potencies in cell-based reporter gene assays. We examined structure-activity trends in both series, using induced-fit computational docking to propose binding poses for these molecules in the coactivator binding groove. Analysis of the structure of the ER-steroid receptor coactivator (SRC) complex suggests that all four hydrophobic residues within the SRC nuclear receptor box sequence are important binding elements. Thus, insufficient water displacement upon binding of the smaller CBIs in the expansive complexation site may be limiting the potency of the compounds in these series, which suggests that higher potency CBIs might be found by screening compound libraries enriched with larger molecules.
Small molecules, namely coactivator binding inhibitors (CBIs), that block estrogen signaling by directly inhibiting the intn class="Gene">eraction of the estrogen receptor (ER) with coactivator proteins act in a fundamentally different way to traditional antagonists, which displace the endogenous ligand estradiol. To complement our prior efforts at CBI discovery by de novo design, we used high-throughput screening (HTS) to identify CBIs of novel structure and subsequently investigated two HTS hits by analogue synthesis, finding many compounds with low micromolar potencies in cell-based reporter gene assays. We examined structure-activity trends in both series, using induced-fit computational docking to propose binding poses for these molecules in the coactivator binding groove. Analysis of the structure of the ER-steroid receptor coactivator (SRC) complex suggests that all four hydrophobic residues within the SRC nuclear receptor box sequence are important binding elements. Thus, insufficientwater displacement upon binding of the smallerCBIs in the expansive complexation site may be limiting the potency of the compounds in these series, which suggests that higher potency CBIs might be found by screening compound libraries enriched with larger molecules.
Authors: Richard A Friesner; Robert B Murphy; Matthew P Repasky; Leah L Frye; Jeremy R Greenwood; Thomas A Halgren; Paul C Sanschagrin; Daniel T Mainz Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2006-10-19 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Leggy A Arnold; Eva Estébanez-Perpiñá; Marie Togashi; Natalia Jouravel; Anang Shelat; Andrea C McReynolds; Ellena Mar; Phuong Nguyen; John D Baxter; Robert J Fletterick; Paul Webb; R Kiplin Guy Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2005-10-31 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Aiming Sun; Jeong-Joong Yoon; Yan Yin; Andrew Prussia; Yutao Yang; Jaeki Min; Richard K Plemper; James P Snyder Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2008-06-05 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: J Sun; M J Meyers; B E Fink; R Rajendran; J A Katzenellenbogen; B S Katzenellenbogen Journal: Endocrinology Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Kornelia J Skowron; Kenneth Booker; Changfeng Cheng; Simone Creed; Brian P David; Phillip R Lazzara; Amy Lian; Zamia Siddiqui; Thomas E Speltz; Terry W Moore Journal: Mol Cell Endocrinol Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 4.102
Authors: Alessandro Villa; Sara Della Torre; Alessia Stell; Jennifer Cook; Myles Brown; Adriana Maggi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Min Shan; Kathryn E Carlson; Alexander Bujotzek; Anja Wellner; Ronald Gust; Marcus Weber; John A Katzenellenbogen; Rainer Haag Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2013-01-30 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Kriti Singh; Ravi Shashi Nayana Munuganti; Eric Leblanc; Yu Lun Lin; Euphemia Leung; Nada Lallous; Miriam Butler; Artem Cherkasov; Paul S Rennie Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 6.466