Literature DB >> 21365037

The influence of abutment angulation on screw loosening of implants in the anterior maxilla.

Chun-Yeo Ha1, Yung-Jun Lim, Myung-Joo Kim, Jung-Han Choi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared the removal torque values (RTVs) of different abutments (straight, angled, and gold premachined UCLA-type) in external- and internal-hex implants after dynamic cyclic loading with the clinical situation of the anterior maxilla simulated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An ideal cast of a maxilla with a missing right central incisor was fabricated in dental stone, and an implant analog was embedded in this model at a 15-degree angle labial to the long axis of the left central incisor. Thirty external-hex and 30 internal-hex implants were used. A total of 10 straight abutments, 10 angled abutments, and 10 gold premachined UCLA-type abutments of each system and 60 abutment screws were tested. Initial RTVs were measured after each assembly was tightened to 30 Ncm. Straight abutments and angled abutments were prepared and gold-premachined UCLA-type abutments were waxed and cast with low-fusing gold alloy for the central incisor. RTVs were then measured again. After each assembly was tightened, a metal crown was temporarily cemented. After cyclic loading of 20 to 200 N was applied 1 million times, RTVs were measured for a third time. Statistical analysis (alpha = .05) was performed to evaluate the results.
RESULTS: The angled abutment group showed significantly higher RTVs than the straight abutment and gold premachined UCLA-type abutment groups in external-hex implants. However, no significant difference in RTVs was found among abutments in internal-hex implants. The time of analysis of RTV was found to significantly influence mean RTVs. Mean RTVs of external- and internal-hex implants showed significant differences.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, there were significant differences in RTVs among different abutment groups in external-hex implants. There were no significant differences in RTVs among different abutment groups in internal-hex implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21365037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  9 in total

1.  Temperature rise during removal of fractured components out of the implant body: an in vitro study comparing two ultrasonic devices and five implant types.

Authors:  Eric W Meisberger; Sjoerd J G Bakker; Marco S Cune
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2015-03-20

Review 2.  Preload loss of abutment screws after dynamic fatigue in single implant-supported restorations. A systematic review.

Authors:  Beatriz Pardal-Peláez; Javier Montero
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-11-01

3.  In Vitro Evaluation of Manual Torque Values Applied to Implant-Abutment Complex by Different Clinicians and Abutment Screw Loosening.

Authors:  Onur Dincer Kose; Burcin Karataslı; Sabit Demircan; Taha Emre Kose; Erhan Cene; Serhan Aydın Aya; Mehmet Ali Erdem; Abdulkadir Burak Cankaya
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Retention failures in cement- and screw-retained fixed restorations on dental implants in partially edentulous arches: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jatin K Jain; Rajesh Sethuraman; Sameer Chauhan; Piyush Javiya; Shreya Srivastava; Rutvik Patel; Bhagyashri Bhalani
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

5.  Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading.

Authors:  Mai Ahmed Yousry El-Sheikh; Tamer Mohamed Nasr Mostafa; Mohamed Maamoun El-Sheikh
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2018-12-03

6.  Analysis of Torque Maintenance and Fracture Resistance after Fatigue in Retention Screws Made of Different Metals for Screw-Retained Implant-Borne Prosthesis Joints.

Authors:  Maria Beatriz Bello Taborda; Gabriela Sumie Yaguinuma Gonçalves; Cecília Alves de Sousa; Wirley Gonçalves Assunção
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-11-18

7.  Implant-Abutment Misfit after Cyclic Loading: An In Vitro Experimental Study.

Authors:  John Eversong Lucena de Vasconcelos; Jefferson David Melo de Matos; Daher Antonio Queiroz; Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer Lopes; Bruna Caroline Gonçalves Vasconcelos de Lacerda; Marco Antonio Bottino; Cecilia Pedroso Turssi; Roberta Tarkany Basting; Flávia Lucisano Botelho do Amaral; Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.748

8.  Comparative study of abutment screw loosening with or without adhesive material.

Authors:  Mahnaz Arshad; Gholamreza Shirani; Sina Refoua; Mohammadreza Rahimi Yeganeh
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  Comparative effect of implant-abutment connections, abutment angulations, and screw lengths on preloaded abutment screw using three-dimensional finite element analysis: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Krishna Chaitanya Kanneganti; Dileep Nag Vinnakota; Srinivas Rao Pottem; Mahesh Pulagam
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.